American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 51, Issue 6 , Pages 952-965, June 2008

A 1-Year Randomized Trial of Calcium Acetate Versus Sevelamer on Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification in Hemodialysis Patients With Comparable Lipid Control: The Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation-2 (CARE-2) Study

  • Wajeh Qunibi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Wajeh Y. Qunibi, MD, Professor of Medicine, Medical Director of Dialysis Services, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900.
  • ,
  • Moustafa Moustafa, MD

      Affiliations

    • South Carolina Nephrology and Hypertension, Orangeburg, SC
  • ,
  • Larry R. Muenz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Larry R. Muenz & Associates, Gaithersburg, MD
  • ,
  • David Y. He, MS

      Affiliations

    • Larry R. Muenz & Associates, Gaithersburg, MD
  • ,
  • Paul D. Kessler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, Rockville, MD
  • ,
  • Jose A. Diaz-Buxo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, MA
  • ,
  • Mathew Budoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA, Torrance, CA.
  • ,
  • CARE-2 Investigators

Received 30 October 2007; accepted 26 February 2008. published online 23 April 2008.

Background

Previous clinical trials showed that progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) may be slower in hemodialysis patients treated with sevelamer than those treated with calcium-based phosphate binders. Because sevelamer decreases low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, we hypothesized that intensive lowering of LDL-C levels with atorvastatin in hemodialysis patients treated with calcium acetate would result in CAC progression rates similar to those in sevelamer-treated patients.

Study Design

Randomized, controlled, open-label, noninferiority trial with an upper bound for the noninferiority margin of 1.8.

Setting & Participants

203 prevalent hemodialysis patients at 26 dialysis centers with serum phosphorus levels greater than 5.5 mg/dL, LDL-C levels greater than 80 mg/dL, and baseline CAC scores of 30 to 7,000 units assessed by means of electron-beam computed tomography.

Interventions

103 patients were randomly assigned to calcium acetate, and 100 patients to sevelamer for 12 months to achieve phosphorus levels of 3.5 to 5.5 mg/dL. Atorvastatin was added to achieve serum LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL in both groups.

Outcomes & Measurements

The primary end point was change in CAC score assessed by means of electron-beam computed tomography.

Results

After 12 months, mean serum LDL-C levels decreased to 68.8 ± 22.0 mg/dL in the calcium-acetate group and 62.4 ± 23.0 mg/dL in the sevelamer group (P = 0.3). Geometric mean increases in CAC scores were 35% in the calcium-acetate group and 39% in the sevelamer group, with a covariate-adjusted calcium acetate–sevelamer ratio of 0.994 (95% confidence interval, 0.851 to 1.161).

Limitations

Treatment assignment was not blinded. The 1.8 a priori margin is large, CAC is a surrogate outcome, duration of treatment was short, and dropout rate was high.

Conclusions

With intensive lowering of LDL-C levels for 1 year, hemodialysis patients treated with either calcium acetate or sevelamer experienced similar progression of CAC.

Index Words: Cardiovascular disease, hyperphosphatemia, dialysis, vascular calcification, secondary hyperparathyroidism, electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT), low-density lipoprotein, statins, atorvastatin, cholesterol, dyslipidemia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A list of the CARE-2 Investigators appears at the end of this article.

 Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; study number: NCT00211939.

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.298 on April 17, 2008.

PII: S0272-6386(08)00526-X

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.298

Refers to article:

  • Calcification in CKD: No Closer to the Cure

    Bryan Kestenbaum
    American Journal of Kidney Diseases June 2008 (Vol. 51, Issue 6, Pages 877-879)

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 51, Issue 6 , Pages 952-965, June 2008