American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 54, Issue 6 , Pages 1186-1187, December 2009

The Validity of Fractional Excretion of Uric Acid in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury Due to Decreased Kidney Perfusion

Article Outline

 

To the Editor:

The validity of the fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by decreased kidney perfusion is limited in patients receiving diuretics. Fractional excretion of uric acid (FE) may be useful in such cases.1, 2, 3

We studied the validity of FE in 44 patients, 22 (15 men and 7 women; mean age, 57.4 ± 16.2 [SD] years) with AKI caused by decreased kidney perfusion and 22 (14 men and 9 women; mean age, 54.2 ± 14.5 years) with AKI from other causes.

We measured sodium (Na), creatinine (Cr), and uric acid (UA) in serum (S) and a spot urine sample (U) and calculated FENa and FEUA using the formulas (NaU · CrS/CrU · NaS) · 100 and (UAU · CrS/CrU · UAS) · 100, respectively. No patient had used diuretics. The diagnosis of AKI from decreased kidney perfusion was based on: (1) clinical manifestations of hypovolemia, oliguria, or significant decrease in urine output; (2) absence of urine findings indicating intrinsic renal injury; and (3) quick restitution of urine output, as well as renal function, after correction of the hemodynamic disturbances.

FENa and FE were significantly lower in the patients with AKI caused by decreased kidney perfusion. For these patients, the limit of detection for FENa was 2.47% (with 91% sensitivity and specificity), and for FEUA, 23.79% (82% sensitivity/specificity). In the comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves, there was a trend (P = 0.085) toward greater accuracy of FENa than FEUA (Fig 1). In conclusion, calculation of FEUA may be a useful method for the diagnosis of AKI caused by decreased kidney perfusion.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 1. 

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for fractional excretion of sodium (FENa; upper plot) and uric acid (FEUA; lower plot). P = 0.09.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

The corresponding author, Dr Kosmadakis, may be contacted at george.kosmadakis@googlemail.com.

Support: None.

Financial Disclosure: None.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Steiner RW. Interpreting the fractional excretion of sodium. Am J Med. 1984;77(4):699–702
  2. Quarantino CP, Di Sciascio N, Rucci C, Ciaglia P, Giacomello A. The normal range of serum urate levels and of fractional urate excretion. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;370:91–93
  3. Cappuccio FP, Strazzyllo P, Farinaro E, Trevisan M. Uric acid metabolism and tubular sodium handling (Results from a population-based study). JAMA. 1993;270(3):354–359

PII: S0272-6386(09)01257-8

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.008

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 54, Issue 6 , Pages 1186-1187, December 2009