American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 55, Issue 3 , Pages 431-440, March 2010

Patient Views About Treatment of Stage 5 CKD: A Qualitative Analysis of Semistructured Interviews

  • Rachael L. Morton, MScMed (Clin Epi)(Hons)

      Affiliations

    • School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Rachael L. Morton, MScMed (Clin Epi)(Hons), School of Public Health, Edward Ford Bldg A27, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • ,
  • Jeannie Devitt, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Kirsten Howard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Kate Anderson, BSc(Psych)(Hons)

      Affiliations

    • The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Paul Snelling, MB, ChB

      Affiliations

    • Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • ,
  • Alan Cass, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The George Institute for International Health, Sydney, Australia
    • Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Received 24 August 2009; accepted 24 November 2009. published online 01 February 2010.

Background

How patients choose between alternative treatments for kidney failure is poorly understood. Recent studies of chronic kidney disease report that clinical outcomes, such as life expectancy, are rarely reflected in a patient's decision for type of treatment compared with nonclinical outcomes, such as time on dialysis therapy, convenience, or impact on the family.

Methods

A qualitative analysis using thematic synthesis of patient views about renal replacement therapy (RRT) was undertaken. As part of a national study of patients and renal health care providers, we interviewed 95 Australian dialysis and transplant patients to explore how they perceive these alternative treatments.

Results

52 patients were on satellite hemodialysis therapy, 8 patients were on incenter hemodialysis therapy, 8 patients were on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis therapy, 5 patients were on automated peritoneal dialysis therapy, 4 patients were on home hemodialysis therapy, and 18 patients had a functioning transplant at the time of interview. Freedom, convenience, self-care, effectiveness, and simplicity were commonly cited positive characteristics, whereas confinement, risk, family burden, pain, and time commitment were negative characteristics associated with RRTs. Characteristics were not specific to dialysis modalities, and some (eg, self-care) were seen as both positive and negative. A limitation of the study was that only 17 of 77 (22%) dialysis patients interviewed were on a home-based therapy.

Conclusions

Patients preferred RRTs that enhanced their freedom and autonomy and were convenient, effective, and simple. Treatments that minimized confinement and risk also were viewed positively. Our analysis suggests that patients might choose between therapies based on their perception regarding which therapy most embodies particular characteristics that minimize impact on their lifestyle. Presentation of information regarding RRTs should focus on these characteristics and the potential impact of alternative treatments on the patients and how they wish to lead their lives.

Index Words: Chronic kidney disease, dialysis, transplant, decision making

 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.011 on February 1, 2010.

PII: S0272-6386(09)01580-7

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.011

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 55, Issue 3 , Pages 431-440, March 2010