American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 56, Issue 2 , Pages 189-218, August 2010

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2009 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients

  • Margaret Bia, MD

      Affiliations

    • Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Margaret Bia, MD, Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208029, New Haven, CT 06520-8029
  • ,
  • Deborah B. Adey, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Vermont/Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT
  • ,
  • Roy D. Bloom, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Laurence Chan, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
  • ,
  • Sanjay Kulkarni, MD

      Affiliations

    • Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
  • ,
  • Steven Tomlanovich, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Francisco, CA

published online 02 July 2010.

In response to recently published KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines for the care of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) organized a working group of transplant nephrologists and surgeons to review these guidelines and comment on their relevance and applicability for US KTRs. The following commentaries on the KDIGO guidelines represent the consensus of our work group. The KDIGO transplant guidelines concentrated on aspects of transplant care most important to this population in the posttransplant period, such as immunosuppression, infection, malignancy, and cardiovascular care. Our KDOQI work group concurred with many of the KDIGO recommendations except in some important areas related to immunosuppression, in which decisions in the United States are largely made by transplant centers and are dependent in part on the specific patient population served. Most, but not all, KDIGO guidelines are relevant to US patients. However, implementation of many may remain a major challenge because of issues of limitation in resources needed to assist in the tasks of educating, counseling, and implementing and maintaining lifestyle changes. Although very few of the guidelines are based on evidence that is strong enough to justify their being used as the basis of policy or performance measures, they offer an excellent road map to navigate the complex care of KTRs.

Index Words: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate compound (MPA compound), inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor), KDIGO, KDOQI

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.04.010 on July 2, 2010.

 Reprint requests to Kerry Willis, PhD, National Kidney Foundation, 30 E 33rd St, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: kerryw@kidney.org

PII: S0272-6386(10)00802-4

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.04.010

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 56, Issue 2 , Pages 189-218, August 2010