Optimizing erythropoietin therapy in hemodialysis patients☆
Abstract
The European Best Practice Guidelines for the management of anemia in patients with chronic renal failure recommend the percentage of hypochromic red blood cells (%HRCs) as the best measure of iron use by erythropoietic tissues. They suggest that [ldquo ]sufficient iron should be administered to attain: serum ferritin 100 ng/mL, HRCs [lt ]10%. In practice, to achieve these minimum criteria will mean aiming for optimal levels of serum ferritin 200-500 ng/mL, HRCs [lt ]2.5%.[rdquo ] We increased prospectively the delivered dose of iron supplements to a large (n [equals] 228) unselected hemodialysis cohort with a sustained (24-month) hemoglobin (Hb) outcome meeting the UK Renal Association minimum standard of 85%, greater than or equal to 10.0 g/dL. This was managed through a computer-aided decision support system for erythropoietin (EPO) and intravenous iron sucrose therapy. Hb outcome was maintained with medians between 11.3 and 11.8 g/dL. Median red blood cell hypochromia (%HRCs) decreased from 8% (interquartile range [lsqb ]IQR[rsqb ], 3 to 15) to 4% (IQR, 2 to 8; P [lt ] 0.001, U-Mann Whitney test). Serum ferritin level increased from a median of 188 (IQR, 115 to 256) to 480 ng/mL (IQR, 397 to 595; P [lt ] 0.001, U-Mann Whitney test). Median EPO dose decreased from 136 (IQR, 83 to 216) to 72 IU/kg/wk (IQR, 33 to 134), which strongly correlated with median %HRCs through the range less than 10% (Spearman[apos ]s correlation, 0.73; P [lt ] 0.01). These data suggest that EPO responsiveness continues to improve toward the normal range for %HRCs ([lt ]2.5%) and aspiring to values much less than 10% is cost-effective. The ferritin outcome required to achieve these lower values for %HRC outcome is greater than the current recommended range, although in steady state, the mean iron treatment dose is similar to that in previous studies (ie, [sim ]60 mg/wk). [copy ] 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Supported in part by the Yorkshire Kidney Research Fund (D.R.).
PII: S0272-6386(01)84959-3
doi:10.1053/ajkd.2001.25203
© 2001 The National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
