American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 42, Supplement 1 , Pages 36-41, July 2003

Patient quality of life on quotidian hemodialysis

  • A.Paul Heidenheim, MA

      Affiliations

    • Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Norman Muirhead, MD

      Affiliations

    • Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Louise Moist, MD

      Affiliations

    • Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Robert M Lindsay, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Robert M. Lindsay, MD, Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Centre, Westminster Campus, 800 Commissioners Rd East, London, ON, Canada N6A 4G5
    • Optimal Dialysis Research Unit, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada

Abstract 

Background:

Studies have shown improved quality of life for hemodialysis (HD) patients after changing from conventional thrice-weekly HD treatment to more frequent HD.

Methods:

In the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study, 23 patients (11 patients, short daily HD; 12 patients, long nocturnal HD) were compared with 22 conventional thrice-weekly HD patients serving as controls. All patients completed 3 sets of quality-of-life assessment tools: (1) a locally developed renal disease-specific questionnaire that assessed dialysis symptoms, uremic symptoms, psychosocial stress, and social-leisure activity; (2) the generic Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short Form (SF-36); and (3) the global Health Utilities Index (HUI). As a supplement to the HUI, a subset of patients was asked to complete the Time Trade-Off assessment.

Results:

Overall, the reduction in symptoms shows better fluid management because quotidian HD patients reported experiencing fewer and less severe cramping during dialysis, fewer headaches, less hypotension, fewer episodes of dizziness, decreased fluid restrictions, fewer blood pressure problems, decreased interdialytic weight gains, fewer episodes of shortness of breath, and a reduction in the sensation of easily feeling cold. HUI results showed that quotidian HD patients maintained functionality throughout the study period, whereas control patients showed a significant loss. Given the choice, all patients chose to remain on quotidian HD therapy after switching from conventional HD therapy. The Time Trade-Off analysis indicated that study patients were willing to trade far less time on quotidian HD therapy and much more time on conventional HD therapy in exchange for “perfect” health.

Conclusion:

As more studies focus on improved patient outcomes and appropriate funding mechanisms are established, more frequent home HD treatment should become a standard treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease.

Keywords:  Quotidian hemodialysis (HD), daily hemodialysis (HD), nocturnal hemodialysis (HD), quality of life, Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), Health Utilities Index (HUI), Time Trade-Off

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The London Daily/Nocturnal Dialysis Study was totally financed by a grant from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care of the Province of Ontario, Canada. The publication of this supplement was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health and Fresenius Medical Care of North America.

PII: S0272-6386(03)00536-5

doi:10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00536-5

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 42, Supplement 1 , Pages 36-41, July 2003