American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 44, Issue 1 , Pages 84-93, July 2004

Validation of the modification of diet in renal disease formula for estimating GFR with special emphasis on calibration of the serum creatinine assay

  • Stein Hallan, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, St Olavs Hospital/NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Stein Hallan, MD, PhD, St Olavs Hospital/NTNU, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Olav Kyrres gt. 17, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Arne Åsberg, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, St Olavs Hospital/NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Morten Lindberg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Biochemistry, St Olavs Hospital/NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Harald Johnsen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Olavs Hospital/Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Received 22 December 2003; accepted 11 March 2004.

Abstract 

The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula is recommended by European and American guidelines for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, the accuracy of the formula has been questioned in several studies. Our objective is to evaluate the performance of the MDRD formula with special emphasis on the possibility that interlaboratory calibration differences for serum creatinine reduce the accuracy of the formula. The MDRD and 7 other commonly used formulae were evaluated regarding bias, precision, and accuracy. The 215 adults included were patients with chronic kidney disease, potential kidney donors, and patients referred before nephrotoxic chemotherapy. Serum creatinine was measured by means of a kinetic Jaffé method (Hitachi 917, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan; reagents from Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). GFR, measured as plasma clearance of chromium 51–labeled EDTA (Cr-EDTA), ranged from 3 to 162 mL/min/1.73 m2. The MDRD formula was heavily biased, but it still had significantly better accuracy than the other formulae tested. After recalibrating our serum creatinine values (serum creatinine [mg/dL] = −0.215 + 1.08 ∗ serum creatinine), systematic bias was greatly reduced and better accuracy was achieved: 45.6% of results differed less than 15% from Cr-EDTA, 64.2% differed less than 30%, and 81.4% differed less than 50%. The equation for recalibrating creatinine values was based on data with traceability to reference methods and on sensitivity analysis. The MDRD formula seems to be the best formula available for GFR estimating, but it is based on a serum creatinine method calibrated to give much lower values than most laboratories, leading to underestimation of GFR in mild renal insufficiency.

Keywords:  Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), prediction equations, serum creatinine, calibration, validation, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0272-6386(04)00510-4

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.03.027

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 44, Issue 1 , Pages 84-93, July 2004