American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 385-401, September 2004

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A systematic review

  • Annalisa Perna, StatSciD

      Affiliations

    • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Annalisa Perna, StatSciD, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases Aldo e Cele Daccò, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Via Gavazzeni 11, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
  • ,
  • Arrigo Schieppati, MD

      Affiliations

    • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy
    • Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
  • ,
  • Javier Zamora, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy
  • ,
  • Giovanni A. Giuliano, DiplStat

      Affiliations

    • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy
  • ,
  • Norbert Braun, MD

      Affiliations

    • Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Remuzzi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy
    • Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy

Received 14 January 2004; accepted 10 May 2004.

Background: This study aims to assess whether immunosuppression is beneficial in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Methods: We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the effect of immunosuppression on histologically proven IMN in adults with nephrotic syndrome followed up for at least 6 months. The literature was searched according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Four therapeutic classes were considered: (1) steroids (alone), (2) alkylating agents (alone or in combination with steroids), (3) calcineurin inhibitors (alone or in combination with steroids), and (4) antiproliferative agents (alone). Results: Eighteen RCTs were selected (1,025 patients). Overall, no differences were found between immunosuppressive treatment and placebo or no treatment. For oral glucocorticoid therapy, no beneficial effect was observed. For alkylating agents, a beneficial effect was observed on complete remission (relative risk [RR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32 to 4.25; P = 0.004). Excluding patients with particularly well-preserved renal function, there was no significant difference in complete remission. Cyclophosphamide therapy resulted in a lower rate of adverse-event discontinuations compared with chlorambucil (8 versus 21 discontinuations, respectively; RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.25 to 4.39; P = 0.008). For calcineurin inhibitors, no difference was observed. For antiproliferative agents, a paucity of data did not allow a conclusion. Conclusion: The meta-analysis failed to show a long-term effect of treatment on patient and/or renal survival. There is weak evidence that the immunosuppressive regimen increased the remission rate. The review of safety showed a higher number of discontinuations for adverse events in immunosuppressive-treatment groups and that cyclophosphamide had fewer side effects than chlorambucil.

Index words:  Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) , adult , nephrotic syndrome (NS) , immunosuppressive therapy , systematic review

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This review is excerpted from a Cochrane Review that will be published in The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 4 (http://www.update-software.com/cochrane). Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges in response to comments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.

PII: S0272-6386(04)00809-1

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.05.020

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 385-401, September 2004