American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 48, Issue 2 , Pages 192-204, August 2006

Identification and Referral of Patients With Progressive CKD: A National Study

  • L. Ebony Boulware, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to L. Ebony Boulware, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology, Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 2024 E Monument St, Ste 2-600, Baltimore, MD 21205
  • ,
  • Misty U. Troll, MPH
  • ,
  • Bernard G. Jaar, MD, MPH
  • ,
  • Donna I. Myers, MD
  • ,
  • Neil R. Powe, MD, MPH, MBA

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Nephrology Center of Maryland; and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.

Received 10 March 2006; accepted 20 April 2006. published online 19 June 2006.

Background: It is unclear whether primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists differ in their recognition of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), agree on diagnostic and referral strategies, and identify similar barriers to caring for patients. Methods: We conducted a national study of PCPs and nephrologists in the United States through a questionnaire describing a PCP caring for a patient with progressing CKD and questions to assess recognition of kidney dysfunction and approaches to diagnostic evaluation and referral. We identified participant and patient characteristics independently associated with CKD recognition and referral. Results: We randomly identified a national sample of 304 physicians (126 nephrologists [39% response rate], 89 family physicians [28% response rate], and 89 general internists [28% response rate]). PCPs recognized CKD less (adjusted percentage, 59%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47 to 69, family physicians; adjusted percentage, 78%; 95% CI, 67 to 86, general internists; adjusted percentage, 97%; 95% CI, 93 to 99, nephrologists; P < 0.01), differed from nephrologists in their recommendations for diagnostic testing, and recommended referral less (adjusted percentage, 76%; 95% CI, 65 to 84, family physicians; adjusted percentage, 81%; 95% CI, 70 to 89, general internists; adjusted percentage, 99%; 95% CI, 95 to 100, nephrologists; P < 0.01). PCPs differed from nephrologists in their expected intensity of specialists’ involvement in care (16%, family physicians; 20%, general internists; 6%, nephrologists recommending nephrologist input monthly to every 6 months; P = 0.01). Lack of awareness of clinical practice guidelines and lack of clinical and administrative resources were identified as important barriers to care. Conclusion: PCPs recognize and recommend specialist care for progressive CKD less than nephrologists and differ in their clinical evaluations and expectations for referral. Improved dissemination of existing guidelines and targeted education in conjunction with efforts to build consensus among PCPs and nephrologists regarding their roles in the care of patients with CKD, including the collaborative development of clinical practice guidelines, could enhance patient care.

Index Words:  Chronic kidney disease (CKD) , guidelines , barriers

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.073 on June 14, 2006.Support: Funding sources are National Kidney Foundation of Maryland Mini-Grant (L.E.B.); Robert Wood Johnson Harold Amos Faculty Development Program (L.E.B.); Grant no. K240502643 from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (N.R.P.). Potential conflicts of interest: None.

PII: S0272-6386(06)00765-7

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.073

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 48, Issue 2 , Pages 192-204, August 2006