“Biased” Comparison Between ANDY-Disc® and UltraBag® in Patients on CAPD

References 

1. Wong H-S, Ong L-M, Lim T-O, et al. A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial to determine peritonitis rate, product defect, and technique survival between ANDY-Disc® and UltraBag® in patients on CAPD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48:464–472
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (329 KB)
   • CrossRef
2. Daly CD, Campbell MK. Is it possible for studies comparing Y-set, double bag, and standard systems of CAPD to be blinded?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16:2440–2441
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, et al. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25:107–131
   • MEDLINE
4. Li PK, Law MC, Chow KM, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome and ease of handling in two double-bag systems in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:373–380
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (57 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Subhramanyam SV, Sinoj KA, Mary B, Nayak KS. Our experience with new connectology for CAPD. Perit Dial Int. 2005;25(suppl 2):S22;abstr
6. Nayak KS. Overcoming CAPD cost barrier in Asian developing countries. 2002;Presented at the First Asian Chapter Meeting, International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, December 13-15, Hong Kong