American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 172-173, January 2007

In Reply

  • Hin-Seng Wong, FRCP(Edin)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur
  • ,
  • Teck-Onn Lim, M. Stats, FRCP(Edin) (Director)

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • ,
  • Loke-Meng Ong, MRCP(UK)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Hospital Penang, Penang, Malaysia

Article Outline

 

In Reply:

We agree with Dr Nayak that it is impossible to eliminate bias in an open-label study. Unfortunately it is impossible to conduct a double-blind study comparing different continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) connection systems. To eliminate bias when comparing ANDY-Disc and UltraBag in this study,1 we took numerous statistical and clinical steps including independent and blinded verification of the peritonitis episodes and centralized training of CAPD nurses. Touch contamination occurring during the change in transfer set and training for ANDY-Disc should manifest as peritonitis during the 1-month wash-in period. The number of peritonitis episodes occurring in each month of the 1-year follow-up period was similar for each system, clearly demonstrating that changing of transfer set and training for ANDY-Disc were not the reasons for the difference in the peritonitis rate (Table 1). As patients were followed up for 1 year, the higher number of peritonitis episodes occurring in the middle portion of the 2-year study period was a reflection of the larger number of study subjects during that period where most patients have not completed the study. Li and co workers2 did not demonstrate any difference between StaySafe and UltraBag, but their study was not designed to test for equivalence and their study population was much smaller. To amplify any differences in the 2 systems, we recruited CAPD patients who were at high risk of developing CAPD peritonitis. This probably explains the higher peritonitis rates in this study1 when compared to those reported by other authors.3, 4

Table 1. Number of Peritonitis and Staphylococcus epidermidis Peritonitis Episodes After Enrollment
Month
123456789101112
All peritonitis
ANDY-Disc755667833185
UltraBag1042573142221
S epidermidis peritonitis
ANDY-Disc303211002001
UltraBag201110000000

AJKD welcomes Letters to the Editor that are in response to an article that appeared in the journal no more than 6 months previously. A title, different from that of the original article, should be included. Letters must not exceed 250 words (excluding references, maximum number 10) and may contain no more than 1 figure or table. There is no guarantee that letters will be published. Letters are subject to editing and abridgment without notice.

Letters should be submitted via AJKD’s online manuscript handling site, www.editorialmanager.com/ajkd. More information, including details about how to contact the editorial staff for assistance, is available in the journal’s Information for Authors.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Wong H-S, Ong L-M, Lim T-O, et al. A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial to determine peritonitis rate, product defect, and technique survival between ANDY-Disc® and UltraBag® in patients on CAPD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48:464–472
  2. Li PK-T, Law MC, Chow KM, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome and ease of handling in two double-bag systems in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:373–380
  3. Harris DC, Yuill EJ, Byth K, Chapman JR, Hunt C. Twin- versus single-bag disconnect systems: Infection rates and cost of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:2392–2398
  4. Fourtounas C, Savidaki E, Dousdabanis P, et al. Peritonitis during the first year after commencement of peritoneal dialysis has an impact on technique survival and patient morbidity. Adv Perit Dial. 2006;22:50–54

 Support: Supported in part by grants from Fresenius Medical Care and Baxter. Potential conflicts of interest: None.

PII: S0272-6386(06)01694-5

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.11.025

Refers to article:

  • “Biased” Comparison Between ANDY-Disc® and UltraBag® in Patients on CAPD

    Karopadi Shivanand Nayak
    American Journal of Kidney Diseases January 2007 (Vol. 49, Issue 1, Page 172)

  • A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial to Determine Peritonitis Rate, Product Defect, and Technique Survival Between ANDY-Disc® and UltraBag® in Patients on CAPD , 27 July 2006

    Hin-Seng Wong, Loke-Meng Ong, Teck-Onn Lim, Lai-Seong Hooi, Zaki Morad, Rozina Ghazalli, Wan Shaariah, Yam-Ngo Lim, Ghazali Ahmad, Bak-Leong Goh, Lynster Liaw, Susan Pee, Ming-Lee Lee
    American Journal of Kidney Diseases September 2006 (Vol. 48, Issue 3, Pages 464-472)

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 49, Issue 1 , Pages 172-173, January 2007