Is a Target Hemoglobin A1c Below 7% Safe in Dialysis Patients?
Refers to article:
In Reply
Katherine R. Tuttle, Robert G. Nelson, Mark E. Molitch
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
July 2007 (Vol. 50, Issue 1, Pages 166-167) Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (252 KB)
The KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diabetes for Chronic Kidney Disease Section 2.1 states that the “[t]arget HbA1c [hemoglobin A1c] for people with diabetes should be < 7.0%, irrespective of the presence or absence of CKD [chronic kidney disease].”1 This statement refers to the current recommendations from the American Diabetes Association (ADA), and is supported by multiple randomized, interventional trials of patients with mostly intact renal function, and observational studies in patients on dialysis. However, the text also addresses several caveats, such as the absence of prospective studies demonstrating the clinical benefit of such an aggressive HbA1c target in dialysis patients, and the unclear correlation between HbA1c levels and the ambient glucose concentrations. In addition, there may be a significant increased risk (up to 5-fold) of hypoglycemia in patients with kidney disease treated with insulin.1 Finally, a recently published observational study using the large Fresenius database2 did not show an association between HbA1c levels and 12-month survival over a large range of values.
The current evidence appears to question the relevance of HbA1c monitoring in dialysis patients, and highlights the risks of therapy to achieve an aggressive HbA1c target. Both the ADA and the Department of Veterans Affairs guidelines3 for the management of diabetes recommend less stringent targets for patients with a severe comorbid condition, with the Veterans Administration specifying a goal below 9%. How did these considerations impact the decision by the KDOQI committee to support the application of the ADA guidelines in these patients?
We suspect that these issues will garner more attention with the development and propagation of clinical performance measures, and are concerned that clinical practice may move toward unproven goals under the guise of evidence-based care.
Letters to the Editor may be in response to an article that appeared in AJKD no more than 6 months previously, or may concern a topic of interest to current nephrology. The body of the letter should be as concise as possible and in general should not exceed 250 words. Up to 10 references and 1 figure or table may be included. There is no guarantee that letters will be published. Letters are subject to editing and abridgment without notice.
Letters should be submitted via AJKD’s online manuscript handling site, www.editorialmanager.com/ajkd. More information, including details about how to contact the editorial staff for assistance, is available in the journal’s Information for Authors.
References
1. 1National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(suppl 2):S1–S180.
Full-Text PDF (39 KB)
|
CrossRef
2. 2Williams ME, Lazarus JM. Hemodialyzed type I and type II diabetic patients in the US: Characteristics, glycemic control, and survival. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1503–1509. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
3. 3Pogach LM, Sawin CT. Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for diabetes: the Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense guidelines initiative. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(suppl 2):B82–B89.
CrossRef