American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 50, Issue 2 , Pages 248-256, August 2007

Mycophenolate Mofetil in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Clinical Trial With Comparison to a Historic Control Group Treated With Cyclophosphamide

  • Amanda J. Branten, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • A.B. and P.B.-V. contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Peggy W. du Buf-Vereijken, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
    • A.B. and P.B.-V. contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Marc Vervloet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Jack F. Wetzels, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Jack F. Wetzels, MD, PhD, Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Received 14 January 2007; accepted 24 May 2007. published online 30 June 2007.

Background

Cyclophosphamide can decrease proteinuria and improve renal function in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, but has a high risk of side effects. We studied whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could be a reasonable alternative with fewer side effects.

Study Design

Clinical trial with historic controls.

Settings & Participants

32 cases and 32 controls with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and renal insufficiency at multiple centers. For comparison, we selected matched historic controls treated with cyclophosphamide.

Intervention

MMF, 1 g twice daily, for 12 months versus cyclophosphamide, 1.5 mg/kg/d, for 12 months. Both groups also received intermittent methylprednisolone and alternate-day prednisone.

Outcomes & Measurements

Serum creatinine, proteinuria, and side effects during and after treatment.

Results

Median follow-up was 23 months (range, 11 to 46 months). Median serum creatinine levels were 1.8 mg/dL (159 μmol/L) in both groups at baseline and 1.4 mg/dL (124 μmol/L) in the MMF group versus 1.3 mg/dL (115 μmol/L) in the cyclophosphamide group at 12 months (P = 0.4). Proteinuria values at baseline and 12 months were protein of 8.40 and 1.41 g/d in the MMF group versus 9.19 and 1.13 g/d in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.5 at 12 months), respectively. Cumulative incidences of remission of proteinuria at 12 months were 66% in the MMF group versus 72% in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.3). Five patients (16%) in the MMF group versus none in the cyclophosphamide group had disease that did not respond to therapy (P = 0.05). Twelve patients (38%) experienced a relapse and 9 patients (31%) were re-treated in the MMF group compared with 4 (13%) and 2 patients (6%) in the cyclophosphamide group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.024, respectively). Side effects occurred in 24 patients (75%) in the MMF group and 22 patients (69%) in the cyclophosphamide group (P = 0.6).

Limitations

Nonrandomized control group, short duration of follow-up.

Conclusions

A 12-month course of MMF decreased proteinuria and improved renal function in the majority of patients, but did not appear as effective or better tolerated than cyclophosphamide. Long-term data and randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain the efficacy of MMF in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Index Words: Immunosuppression, membranous nephropathy, mycophenolate mofetil, proteinuria, renal function decrease

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.015 on June 28, 2007.

 Trial registration:www.clinicaltrials.gov; study number: NCT00135967.

PII: S0272-6386(07)00841-4

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.015

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 50, Issue 2 , Pages 248-256, August 2007