Journal Home
Search for

Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 566-573 (October 2007)


View previous. 15 of 33 View next.

Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Excretion of Urea and Fractional Excretion of Sodium in the Evaluations of Patients With Acute Kidney Injury With or Without Diuretic Treatment

Marie-Noëlle Pépin, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Josée Bouchard, MD, Louis Legault, MD, Jean Éthier, MD

Received 6 December 2006; accepted 10 July 2007. published online 28 August 2007.

Background

The accuracy of fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) for the diagnosis of transient acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by decreased kidney perfusion is reported to be low in patients administered diuretics.

Study Design

This is a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing the performance of fractional excretion of urea (FEur) with that of FENa to distinguish between transient and persistent AKI.

Setting & Participants

99 patients hospitalized at a tertiary-care center who developed AKI (≥30% increase in serum creatinine level from baseline within 1 week).

Index Test

FEur and FENa were calculated for each patient.

Reference Test & Measurements

Patients were classified as having transient or persistent AKI according to the clinical context and whether serum creatinine level returned to baseline within 7 days. Each group also was subdivided according to exposure to diuretics. FEur of 35% or less and FENa of 1% or less were used to define transient AKI. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each index test.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity of FEur were 48% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 79% and 33% in patients administered diuretics. Sensitivity and specificity of FENa were 78% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 58% and 81% in those administered diuretics. Receiver operating characteristic curves did not identify a better diagnostic cutoff value for FEur or FENa.

Limitations

Small sample size, variable exposure to diuretics, and a high proportion of preexisting chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions

In patients without diuretic use, FENa is better able to distinguish transient from persistent AKI. In patients administered diuretics, this distinction cannot be made accurately by means of FENa. FEur cannot be used as an alternative tool because it lacks specificity.

Nephrology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Marie-Noëlle Pépin, MD, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1058 St Denis, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3J4, Canada.

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001 on August 27, 2007.

PII: S0272-6386(07)01029-3

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001


View previous. 15 of 33 View next.