American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 566-573, October 2007

Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Excretion of Urea and Fractional Excretion of Sodium in the Evaluations of Patients With Acute Kidney Injury With or Without Diuretic Treatment

Nephrology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Received 6 December 2006; accepted 10 July 2007. published online 28 August 2007.

Background

The accuracy of fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) for the diagnosis of transient acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by decreased kidney perfusion is reported to be low in patients administered diuretics.

Study Design

This is a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing the performance of fractional excretion of urea (FEur) with that of FENa to distinguish between transient and persistent AKI.

Setting & Participants

99 patients hospitalized at a tertiary-care center who developed AKI (≥30% increase in serum creatinine level from baseline within 1 week).

Index Test

FEur and FENa were calculated for each patient.

Reference Test & Measurements

Patients were classified as having transient or persistent AKI according to the clinical context and whether serum creatinine level returned to baseline within 7 days. Each group also was subdivided according to exposure to diuretics. FEur of 35% or less and FENa of 1% or less were used to define transient AKI. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each index test.

Results

Sensitivity and specificity of FEur were 48% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 79% and 33% in patients administered diuretics. Sensitivity and specificity of FENa were 78% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 58% and 81% in those administered diuretics. Receiver operating characteristic curves did not identify a better diagnostic cutoff value for FEur or FENa.

Limitations

Small sample size, variable exposure to diuretics, and a high proportion of preexisting chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions

In patients without diuretic use, FENa is better able to distinguish transient from persistent AKI. In patients administered diuretics, this distinction cannot be made accurately by means of FENa. FEur cannot be used as an alternative tool because it lacks specificity.

Index Words: Fractional excretion of urea, fractional excretion of sodium, acute kidney injury, diuretics, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001 on August 27, 2007.

PII: S0272-6386(07)01029-3

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 50, Issue 4 , Pages 566-573, October 2007