Journal Home
Search for

Volume 50, Issue 6, Page 1052 (December 2007)


View previous. 28 of 34 View next.

Managing Dialysis Catheter–Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Tushar Jitendra Vachharajani, MD, DNB, Shahriar Moossavi, MD, PhD

Refers to article:
Acute Phosphate Nephropathy Following Oral Sodium Phosphate Solution to Cleanse the Bowel for Colonoscopy , 18 May 2007
Annette Beyea, Clay Block, Alan Schned
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
July 2007 (Vol. 50, Issue 1, Pages 151-154)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (1167 KB)
Treatment of Dialysis Catheter–Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia With an Antibiotic Lock: A Quality Improvement Report , 16 June 2007
Ivan D. Maya, Donna Carlton, Erin Estrada, Michael Allon
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
August 2007 (Vol. 50, Issue 2, Pages 289-295)
Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (112 KB)
In Reply
Ivan D. Maya, Michael Allon
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
December 2007 (Vol. 50, Issue 6, Page 1052)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (43 KB)

Article Outline

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

To the Editor:

In their retrospective study, Maya et al1 report the routine use of antibiotic lock solution in treating dialysis catheter–related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia to be inappropriate. We read the article with great interest and agree with the conclusions, but have some concerns regarding the study design and definitions used.

Early catheter-related bacteremia can be treated either with antibiotic lock solution or catheter exchange over a guidewire as per KDOQI clinical practice recommendations.2 A third option of removal of the infected catheter and replacement after a catheter-free period and negative blood cultures can be implemented if the clinical situation demands it. A better study design would be one in which patients were randomized to either of these first 2 treatment modalities.

Secondly, a sample drawn from the dialysis catheter during the dialysis session is inappropriate. The presence of a biofilm in the catheter can contaminate any blood that flows through the catheter lumen. Moreover, the authors do not mention the reuse policy in their units, as blood samples obtained from the dialysis tubing connected to reused dialyzers can be contaminated too. We agree with the concerns that obtaining a peripheral blood sample in individual dialysis patients may be difficult, but certainly this is not the case in the entire dialysis population.

Letters to the Editor may be in response to an article that appeared in AJKD no more than 6 months previously, or may concern a topic of interest to current nephrology. The body of the letter should be as concise as possible and in general should not exceed 250 words. Up to 10 references and 1 figure or table may be included. There is no guarantee that letters will be published. Letters are subject to editing and abridgment without notice.

Letters should be submitted via AJKD’s online manuscript handling site, www.editorialmanager.com/ajkd. More information, including details about how to contact the editorial staff for assistance, is available in the journal’s Information for Authors.

Acknowledgements 

return to Article Outline

Support: None.

Financial Disclosure: None.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Maya ID, Carlton D, Estrada E, Allon M. Treatment of dialysis catheter–related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with an antibiotic lock: A quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50:289–295. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (112 KB) | CrossRef

2. 2National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Vascular Access, Update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(suppl 1):S248. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (477 KB) | CrossRef

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

PII: S0272-6386(07)01363-7

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.09.017


View previous. 28 of 34 View next.