Journal Home
Search for

Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 445-454 (March 2008)


View previous. 22 of 38 View next.

A Comparison of Sevelamer and Calcium-Based Phosphate Binders on Mortality, Hospitalization, and Morbidity in Hemodialysis: A Secondary Analysis of the Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) Randomized Trial Using Claims Data

Wendy L. St. Peter, PharmD12Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Jiannong Liu, PhD1, Eric Weinhandl, MS1, Qiao Fan, MS1

Received 11 July 2007; accepted 6 December 2007. published online 01 February 2008.

Refers to article:
Phosphate Binder Choice in Dialysis Patients: A Call for Evidence-Based Rather Than Marketing-Based Clinical Practice
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Marcello Tonelli
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
March 2008 (Vol. 51, Issue 3, Pages 362-365)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (71 KB)
Background

The Dialysis Clinical Outcomes Revisited (DCOR) trial, a large, randomized, multicenter, open-label study, compared effects of sevelamer with calcium-based phosphate binders on mortality and hospitalization in hemodialysis patients. Many patients were lost to follow-up, precluding intent-to-treat analysis by using prospective data collection.

Study Design

Preplanned secondary analysis, intent-to-treat design for all outcomes, using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data.

Setting & Participants

Participants were 18 years or older and on hemodialysis therapy for more than 3 months, with Medicare as primary payor. The trial was completed at the end of 2004.

Intervention

Sevelamer, calcium-based phosphate binders.

Outcomes

Mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization end points.

Measurements

DCOR subjects were linked to the CMS End-Stage Renal Disease database. Outcomes were evaluated through the CMS End-Stage Renal Disease enrollment and claims database; baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions were evaluated using CMS and case-report data.

Results

Groups were well balanced except for a greater percentage of calcium-group patients with atherosclerotic heart disease. Analyses were adjusted by using 10 baseline characteristics. All-cause (17.7 versus 17.4 deaths/100 patient-years; P = 0.8 unadjusted; P = 0.9 adjusted) and cardiovascular mortality (9.0 versus 8.2 deaths/100 patient-years; P = 0.3 unadjusted; P = 0.4 adjusted) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. First hospitalization, cause-specific multiple hospitalizations, first morbidity, and multiple morbidity rates also did not differ significantly. Multiple all-cause hospitalization rate (1.7 versus 1.9 admissions/patient-year; P = 0.03 unadjusted; P = 0.02 adjusted) and hospital days (12.3 versus 13.9 days/patient-year; P = 0.05 unadjusted; P = 0.03 adjusted) were lower in the sevelamer group.

Limitations

Outcome parameters and cardiovascular comorbidity assessments were derived from Medicare claims data; only subjects with Medicare-as-primary-payor status were included in hospitalization and morbidity analyses.

Conclusions

In this secondary analysis, treatment with sevelamer versus calcium-based binders did not affect overall mortality (primary outcome), cause-specific mortality, morbidity, or first or cause-specific hospitalization (secondary outcomes), but there was evidence for a beneficial effect on multiple all-cause hospitalizations and hospital days (secondary outcomes).

1 Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN

2 College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Wendy L. St. Peter, PharmD, Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 914 South 8th St, Ste S-206, Minneapolis, MN 55404.

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.01.004 on January 31, 2008.

PII: S0272-6386(07)01590-9

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.002


View previous. 22 of 38 View next.