American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 51, Issue 5 , Pages 748-758, May 2008

Randomized Controlled Trial of Nutritional Counseling on Body Composition and Dietary Intake in Severe CKD

  • Katrina L. Campbell, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
    • Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Katrina L. Campbell, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, King's College London, 150 Stamford St, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
  • ,
  • Susan Ash, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
    • Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Peter S.W. Davies, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Children's Nutrition Research Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Judith D. Bauer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wesley Research Institute, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Received 19 June 2007; accepted 26 December 2007. published online 04 March 2008.

Background

Progressive loss of kidney function results in an increased risk of malnutrition. Despite this, there is little evidence informing the impact of nutrition intervention on predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD; stages 4 and 5).

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting & Participants

56 outpatients (men, 62%; mean age, 70.7 ± 14.0 [SD] years) with CKD were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 29) or control (n = 27) by using a concealed computer-generated sequence.

Intervention

The intervention group, provided with individualized dietary counseling with regular follow-up aimed at achieving an intake of 0.8 to 1.0 g/kg of protein and greater than 125 kJ/kg of energy, or control, receiving written material only.

Outcomes & Measures

Change in body composition (body cell mass, measured by means of total-body potassium, in 40 of 56 participants), nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment), and energy and protein intake (3-day food record).

Results

During the 12 weeks, the intervention group had 3.5% (95% confidence interval, −2.1 to 9.1) less decrease in body cell mass, 17.7-kJ/kg/d (95% confidence interval, 8.2 to 27.2) greater increase in energy intake, greater improvement in Subjective Global Assessment (P < 0.01), and no significant difference in protein intake compared with the control group (−0.04 g/kg/d; 95% confidence interval, −0.73 to 0.16). The intervention was associated with greater increases in energy and protein intake in women than men (interaction P < 0.001 for both).

Limitations

Power to detect change in body cell mass, potential bias in ascertainment of Subjective Global Assessment.

Conclusions

In predialysis patients with CKD, structured nutrition intervention had a greater effect on energy and protein intake in women than men. Additional investigations are warranted to determine the impact on body composition.

Index Words: Nutrition intervention, chronic kidney disease, predialysis, randomized controlled trial, body cell mass, dietary counseling

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Trial registration: www.anzctr.org.au; study number: ACTRN012606000493549.

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.015 on February 29, 2008.

PII: S0272-6386(08)00003-6

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.015

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 51, Issue 5 , Pages 748-758, May 2008