American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 205-208, August 2008

Racial Differences in Mortality and ESRD

  • Keith Norris, MD

      Affiliations

    • Charles Drew University, Los Angeles, California
    • David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Keith C. Norris, MD, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, 1731 East 120th St, Los Angeles, CA 90059.
    • ,
  • Rajnish Mehrotra, MD

      Affiliations

    • David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
    • Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
    • ,
  • Allen R. Nissenson, MD

      Affiliations

    • David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Article Outline

 

Related Article, p. 251

African Americans in the general population suffer from increased adjusted rates of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in comparison to whites.1, 2 By contrast, a paradox exists for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing long-term dialysis, with African Americans having better survival rates than whites in most studies.3, 4, 5 The existence of racial/ethnic variations in health outcomes provides unique opportunities for understanding biological, environmental, sociocultural, and healthcare system factors that can lead to new strategies to improving not only CKD care, but the health of the nation.6 Several explanations have been posited to contribute to improved outcomes for African Americans on dialysis, such as survival bias,7 a “reverse epidemiology” of cardiovascular risk factors (where modest increases in body mass index, elevated lipids, and blood pressure are protective rather than deleterious),8 and increased access to health care due to Medicare coverage.9, 10

In this issue of the American Journal of Kidney Diseases, an analysis of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project by Newsome and colleagues takes us another step closer to understanding this paradox with a detailed look at progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and pre-ESRD mortality in the same cohort.11 They evaluated data on over 125,000 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older and admitted to a hospital with acute myocardial infarction and assessed rates of ESRD or mortality over a 10-year period. African Americans made up only 6.5% of the study population, but were 14.9% of the 2,161 patients progressing to ESRD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.90 [95% confidence interval, 1.78 to 2.03]). Adjusted pre-ESRD mortality rates were similar for African Americans and whites, with African Americans more likely than their white counterparts to die if the baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was greater than 60 mL/min and more likely to survive if the baseline GFR was below 60 mL/min. Newsome and colleagues showed a similar finding with respect to mortality in a previous analysis where African American patients with worse kidney function, when compared with their white counterparts, experienced better survival, although the reasons remain poorly defined.12 These prior findings support the current report by Newsome et al that the large racial differences in ESRD rates were not accounted for by lower mortality rates among African Americans, especially those with lower GFR, suggesting other factors are involved.

One limitation to generalizing the results of this study is that it selectively examined a group of Medicare patients with coronary artery disease who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction. However, the high rates of cardiovascular disease in CKD patients, the aging of the ESRD population, and the national movement toward coordinated care delivery systems for the chronically ill and capitated or single-payor financing systems for such individuals lend added relevance to this study. Suboptimal use of cardiovascular procedures has generally been reported for minorities, but for CKD patients who are minorities, the initiation of dialysis with its transition to Medicare coverage seems to have leveled the playing field with regard to access to cardiovascular care.13 The finding of a single-payor, coordinated-care system leading to more uniform CKD care was reinforced by a recent report by Gao and colleagues of over 13,000 beneficiaries receiving care through the Department of Defense (DOD). They found similar rates of provider compliance for evidence-based treatment recommendations for African Americans and whites for stages 3 and 4 CKD targets.14 The findings of equity in care for CKD patients treated within such standardized/coordinated care delivery and single-payor financing systems, the latter such as through the DOD or Medicare, coupled with similar non-ESRD mortality rates across racial groups as reported in this issue by Newsome et al, lend further support to the premise that the persistently high ESRD rates in older African Americans with Medicare coverage are due to other factors beyond racial differences in pre-ESRD survival or access to care.

The findings of Newsome et al are also consistent with those of Xue and coworkers, who investigated racial differences in developing ESRD or death due to diabetes and hypertension over a 10-year period in over 1.3 million Medicare beneficiaries older than 66 years at the study start.15 After adjustment for age and sex, African Americans were 2.4 to 2.9 times more likely than whites to develop ESRD, while the mortality rate for African Americans in the overall cohort was 10% higher than their white counterparts, leaving an even smaller pool of African Americans to reach ESRD.

Using pooled analyses of persons with CKD from 4 community-based studies, Weiner and colleagues reported a greater risk of the composite end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke among African Americans than among whites, due in part to a greater severity of hypertension and/or diabetes in the former.16 Similar findings of an excess burden of clinical risk factors for CKD progression among African Americans were noted in a birth cohort analysis by Hsu et al using data from over 13,000 adults in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and in the US Renal Data System spanning years 3 to 8 after the midpoint of NHANES III.17 They found the prevalence of CKD (defined as a GFR of 15 to 59 mL/min) did not differ between African American and white adults, while ESRD incidence was 4.8-fold higher for African Americans. The high rate of ESRD in African Americans with CKD was accompanied by higher systolic (147 versus 136 mm Hg; P = 0.001) and diastolic (82 versus 77 mm Hg; P = 0.02) blood pressure and greater albuminuria (422 versus 158 μg/mg urine albumin-creatinine ratio; P = 0.01). Additional factors that might explain the excess rates of ESRD include higher rates of diabetes, and sociocultural, environmental, and biologic factors as summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Key Factors Contributing to Increased End-Stage Renal Disease Rates in African Americans
Healthcare Systems Level Factors
- Multiple payors and nonuniform provider incentives lead to marked variations in quality of care.
- Paucity of evidence-based data for clinical response to pharmacologic interventions among women and minorities who are underrepresented in most trials.
Biologic Factors (Hereditary and/or Environmentally Influenced)
- Increased rates of hypertension and diabetes.
- Accelerated vascular damage (typically characterized by excess rates of albuminuria) due to increased rates of stress, nutritional deficiencies, toxin exposures, and other.
- Racial/ethnic variations in select enzyme activity, gene expressions, receptor densities and/or polymorphisms, etc, for an array of signaling and metabolic pathways that may affect ESRD progression (eg, increased TGF-β, dysregulation of intrarenal renin-angiotensin system).
Societal and Patient Level Factors
- Institutional racism leading to poverty and high rates of unemployment, under- or uninsurance, and mistrust in large institutions, including health systems, contributes to delays in seeking health care.
- Residential segregation: suboptimal educational systems leading to lower rates of literacy, increased poverty, lower community-level healthcare resources, increased exposure to environmental toxins (eg, small particulate matter, lead), and reduced access to healthy foods and safe environments needed to meet lifestyle recommendations.
- Increased stress and/or depression, low self esteem, reduced personal responsibility related to above; often manifest as maladaptive coping behaviors (eg, overeating, drinking, smoking, substance abuse), increased nocturnal blood pressure, sympathetic activity, and oxidative stress.
- Cultural conflicts and linguistic barriers, which may be perceived by providers or healthcare systems as patient insolence or ignorance, limit trust and effective communication, reduce adherence, and may influence health recommendations or availability of services.

Adapted with permission from6.

With regards to pre-ESRD mortality, Mehrotra et al recently reported a higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality for African Americans with early-stage CKD from a nationally representative sample, a risk modified by age. This disparity remained after accounting for differences in prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors but was attenuated to a nonsignificant level when adjusted for socioeconomic status.18 The modifying effect of age on the racial differences in outcomes revealed greater health disparities in the younger age groups and may explain in part the lack of racial differences in mortality rates in the older cohort followed by Newsome et al. In addition, the analysis by Mehrotra et al did not explore ESRD progression. While survivor bias (such that only the healthiest African Americans survive into old age) or the benefit of Medicare as a single payor providing improved access to care for participating individuals equally may explain improved survival for African Americans with ESRD, they do not explain the high rates of ESRD.

In conclusion, to echo the reflections of Dr Neil Powe: “So if blacks with chronic kidney disease live long enough to develop ESRD but fewer whites do, how does this information inform science and ultimately treatment of patients?”7 As we move forward, what are the key issues around CKD risk factors that may guide our understanding? Outlined in Table 1 are a number of areas for exploration. Select biologically based factors may have both racial and nonracial contributions, such as hypovitaminosis D, which is associated with increased rates of CKD initiation factors (eg, hypertension, diabetes)19 and progression factors (eg, inflammation, fibrosis),20 while vitamin D repletion may improve CKD-related mortality.21 Environmental influences modify gene and/or receptor expression (gene-environmental) as supported by genetic linkage studies describing susceptibility genes for CKD.22 Increased rates of overexpression of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β1) and/or a higher prevalence of specific TGF-β1 polymorphisms in African Americans may contribute to CKD progression and complications.23 Sickle cell trait, which can be found in approximately 8% of African Americans and has traditionally been described as causing renal micro-infarction and hyposthenuria,24 but not CKD, may in fact be an important unrecognized factor contributing to intrarenal inflammation/fibrosis and refractory response to antihypertensive and antidiabetic therapy, as well as other CKD-related vascular complications.6 Newer approaches to assess disease risk for established conditions, such as the use of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in patients with hypertensive CKD who are not responding to therapy25 and the use of allostatic load as a more comprehensive indicator of vascular stress,26, 27 may help to advance CKD care and reduce the burden of ESRD. A rejuvenation of research investments is needed not only for promising basic and clinical renal science, but also in health service delivery and health systems policy. Finally, integrating scientific discovery with increasing public awareness and education regarding CKD represent important strategies for early identification of at-risk populations and early intervention for key determinants of health behaviors that directly affect clinical outcomes.28, 29 Further expansion of creative chronic care coordination approaches, such as reported from the DOD, or currently part of demonstration projects funded by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), has considerable potential to permit focused attention to the needs of CKD patients, and to do so equally for all ethnic/racial groups. This combined approach will be necessary to help bridge socioeconomic disparities, fully activating our potential to address the CKD epidemic and improve the health of our nation.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

Support: None.

Financial Disclosure: None.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Murray CJL, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, et al. Eight Americas: Investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. PLoS Med. 2006;3:1513–1524
  2. Mensah GA, Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB. State of disparities in cardiovascular health in the United States. Circulation. 2005;111:1233–1241
  3. Agodoa L, Eggers P. Racial and ethnic disparities in end-stage kidney failure-survival paradoxes in African-Americans. Semin Dial. 2007;20:577–585
  4. US Renal Data System: USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD. 2007;
  5. Robinson BM, Joffe MM, Pisoni RL, Port FK, Feldman HI. Revisiting survival differences by race and ethnicity among hemodialysis patients: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2910–2918
  6. Norris K, Nissenson AR. Race, gender, and socioeconomic disparities in CKD in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;June 4, [Epub ahead of print]
  7. Powe NR. Reverse race and ethnic disparities in survival increase with severity of chronic kidney disease: what does this mean?. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:905–906
  8. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003;63:793–808
  9. Daumit GL, Hermann JA, Coresh J, et al. Use of cardiovascular procedure among black persons and white persons: A 7-year nationwide study in patients with renal disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:173–182
  10. Powe NR. To have and have not: Health and health care disparities in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2003;64:763–772
  11. Newsome BB, McClellan WM, Allison JJ. Racial differences in the competing risks of mortality and ESRD after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:251–261
  12. Newsome BB, McClellan WM, Coffey CS, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Warnock DG. Survival advantage of black patients with kidney disease after acute myocardial infarction. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:993–999
  13. Daumit GL, Powe NR. Factors influencing access to cardiovascular procedures in patients with chronic kidney disease: Race, sex, and insurance. Semin Nephrol. 2001;21:367–376
  14. Gao SW, Oliver DK, Das N, et al. Assessment of racial disparities in chronic kidney disease stage 3 and 4 care in the Department of Defense health system. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:442–449
  15. Xue JL, Eggers PW, Agodoa LY, Foley RN, Collins AJ. Longitudinal study of racial and ethnic differences in developing end-stage renal disease among aged Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1299–1306
  16. Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Amin MG, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1307–1315
  17. Hsu CY, Lin F, Vittinghoff E, Shlipak MG. Racial differences in the progression from chronic renal insufficiency to end-stage renal disease in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:2902–2907
  18. Mehrotra R, Kermah L, Fried L, Adler S, Norris K. Racial disparities in mortality outcomes in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;April 2, [Epub ahead of print]
  19. Martins D, Wolf M, Pan D, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and the serum levels of vitamin D in the United States: Data from the NHANES III. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1159–1165
  20. Wu-Wong JR, Nakane M, Ma J. Vitamin D analogs modulate the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, thrombospondin-1 and thrombomodulin in human aortic smooth muscle cells. J Vasc Res. 2007;44:11–18
  21. Wolf M, Betancourt J, Chang Y, et al. Impact of activated vitamin D and race on survival among hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;April 9, [Epub ahead of print]
  22. Freedman BI. Susceptibility genes for hypertension and renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(suppl 2):S192–S194
  23. Suthanthiran M, Li B, Song JO. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 hyperexpression in African-American hypertensives: A novel mediator of hypertension and/or target organ damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3479–3484
  24. Schlitt L, Keitel HG. Pathogenesis of hyposthenuria in persons with sickle cell anemia or the sickle cell trait. Pediatrics. 1960;26:249–254
  25. Agarwal R. Ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol. 2007;27:538–543
  26. McEwen BS, Seeman T. Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress (Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:30–47
  27. McEwen BS. Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: Understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583:174–185
  28. Waterman AD, Browne T, Waterman BM, Gladstone EH, Hostetter T. Attitudes and behaviors of African Americans regarding early detection of kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:554–562
  29. Boulware LE. Challenges for public campaigns to improve the health of persons at high risk of developing CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:535–538

PII: S0272-6386(08)00996-7

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.004

Refers to article:

  • Racial Differences in the Competing Risks of Mortality and ESRD After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 13 May 2008

    Britt B. Newsome, William M. McClellan, Jeroan J. Allison, Paul W. Eggers, Shu-Cheng Chen, Allan J. Collins, Catarina I. Kiefe, Christopher S. Coffey, David G. Warnock
    American Journal of Kidney Diseases August 2008 (Vol. 52, Issue 2, Pages 251-261)

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 205-208, August 2008

Article Tools