Journal Home
Search for

Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 412-424 (September 2008)


View previous. 16 of 49 View next.

Progression of Kidney Disease in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Pravastatin Versus Usual Care: A Report From the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)

ALLHAT Collaborative Research GroupMahboob Rahman, MD, MS1, Charles Baimbridge, MS2, Barry R. Davis, MD, PhD2, Joshua Barzilay, MD3, Jan N. Basile, MD4, Mario A. Henriquez, MD5, Anne Huml, MD1, Nelson Kopyt, DO6, Gail T. Louis, RN7, Sara L. Pressel, MS2Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Clive Rosendorff, MD, PhD89, Sithiporn Sastrasinh, MD10, Carol Stanford, MD11

Received 6 December 2007; accepted 12 May 2008. published online 04 August 2008.

Refers to article:
Statins for Slowing Kidney Disease Progression: An as yet Unproven Indication
Marcello Tonelli
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
September 2008 (Vol. 52, Issue 3, Pages 391-394)
Full Text | Full-Text PDF (68 KB)
Background

Dyslipidemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease. The role of statin therapy in the progression of kidney disease is unclear.

Study Design

Prospective randomized clinical trial, post hoc analyses.

Setting & Participants

10,060 participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (lipid-lowering component) stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): less than 60, 60 to 89, and 90 or greater mL/min/1.73 m2. Mean follow-up was 4.8 years.

Intervention

Randomized; pravastatin, 40 mg/d, or usual care.

Outcomes & Measurements

Total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; end-stage renal disease (ESRD), eGFR.

Results

Through year 6, total cholesterol levels decreased in the pravastatin (−20.7%) and usual-care groups (−11.2%). No significant differences were seen between groups for rates of ESRD (1.36 v 1.45/100 patient-years; P = 0.9), composite end points of ESRD and 50% or 25% decrease in eGFR, or rate of change in eGFR. Findings were consistent across eGFR strata. In patients with eGFR of 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater, the pravastatin arm tended to have a higher eGFR.

Limitations

Proteinuria data unavailable, post hoc analyses, unconfirmed validity of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation in normal eGFR range, statin drop-in rate in usual-care group with small cholesterol differential between groups.

Conclusions

In hypertensive patients with moderate dyslipidemia and decreased eGFR, pravastatin was not superior to usual care in preventing clinical renal outcomes. This was consistent across the strata of baseline eGFR. However, benefit from statin therapy may depend on the degree of the cholesterol level decrease achieved.

1 Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

2 University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX

3 Kaiser Permanente of Georgia, Tucker, GA

4 VAMC Charleston, Charleston, SC

5 Bronx Nephrology Hypertension, Bronx, NY

6 Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, PA

7 Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA

8 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York

9 James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

10 VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ

11 University of Missouri School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Sara L. Pressel, MS, 1200 Herman Pressler St, Ste E801, Houston, TX 77030

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.027 on August 6, 2008.

 Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; study number: NCT00000542.

PII: S0272-6386(08)00999-2

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.027


View previous. 16 of 49 View next.