Effect of a Vascular Access Nurse Coordinator to Reduce Central Venous Catheter Use in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Quality Improvement Report
Background
Starting hemodialysis therapy with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with improved patient survival. Clinical audit showed that less than 50% of our patients started hemodialysis therapy with an AVF.
Study Design
Quality improvement report, prospective before and after study.
Setting & Participants
Tertiary referral hospital with 184 patients starting hemodialysis therapy in 2005 and 2006.
Quality Improvement Plan
Situational analysis showed poor overall coordination of surgical waiting lists. Multifaceted intervention included vascular access nurse coordinator and an algorithm to prioritize surgery.
Outcomes
Vascular access used at first hemodialysis treatment in patients with pre–end-stage renal disease in the 12 months before and after the intervention.
Measurements
Proportions of patients starting hemodialysis therapy with an AVF.
Results
Overall, 65% of patients started hemodialysis therapy with an AVF; 2%, with an arteriovenous graft; and 33%, with a catheter. The proportion of patients starting hemodialysis therapy with an AVF increased from 56% preimplementation to 75% postimplementation (P = 0.007). After adjustment for age, sex, late referral, cause of renal failure, and presentation type, patients starting dialysis therapy in the implementation phase were twice as likely to start treatment with an AVF (odds ratio, 2.85; P = 0.008). The total number of catheter-days in the implementation phase was half that of the preimplementation phase (2,833 v 4,685 days).
Limitations
Nonrandomized study.
Conclusions
Implementation of a multifaceted intervention including a vascular access nurse and an algorithm to prioritize surgery significantly increased the proportion of patients starting dialysis therapy with an AVF by improving the overall coordination of the surgical waiting list.
Index Words: Hemodialysis, vascular access, central venous catheter, quality improvement, implementation
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.026 on September 22, 2008.
PII: S0272-6386(08)01176-1
doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.026
© 2008 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
