American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 3, Supplement 3 , Pages S27-S36, March 2009

CKD Surveillance Using Administrative Data: Impact on the Health Care System

  • Allan J. Collins, MD

      Affiliations

    • US Renal Data System Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
    • Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Allan J. Collins, MD, US Renal Data System Coordinating Center, 914 South 8th St, Ste S-406, Minneapolis, MN 55404
  • ,
  • Shu-Cheng Chen, MS

      Affiliations

    • US Renal Data System Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • David T. Gilbertson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • US Renal Data System Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • Robert N. Foley, MB

      Affiliations

    • US Renal Data System Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
    • Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

The US Renal Data System Coordinating Center identifies patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in administrative data sets and determines the overall size of the population with a diagnosis of CKD, with such major comorbid conditions as diabetes and congestive heart failure, and associated expenditures. A 2-year observation period is used to define individuals with at least 1 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code from inpatient claims or at least 2 from outpatient claims or physician and supplier service claims for kidney disease and comorbid conditions. This method is applied to the 5% general Medicare data and extrapolated to the general Medicare population. In the Medicare and dually enrolled Medicare/Medicaid populations, 8% to 10% have CKD or end-stage renal disease, and these groups account for 27% to 35% of expenditures. Hospitalization rates for all patients with cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, infection, and pneumonia are greatest for dialysis patients and patients with CKD compared with patients without CKD. Regarding detection in groups at high risk of CKD, approximately 1 in 5 patients with diabetes, only 1 in 50 patients with hypertension, and 1 in 4 patients with diabetes and hypertension had at least 1 microalbuminuria test in a year. CKD is a major public health issue with large financial implications. Continued surveillance and detection programs are needed to address the burden of disease, level of comorbidity, and access to care. Long-term trend analyses are needed to determine whether morbidity and mortality rates change based on greater detection and treatment efforts.

Index Words: Chronic kidney disease, dialysis, end-stage renal disease, surveillance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0272-6386(08)01724-1

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.07.055

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 3, Supplement 3 , Pages S27-S36, March 2009