American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 4 , Pages 606-616, April 2009

Effect of Pentoxifylline on GFR Decline in CKD: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

  • Robert M. Perkins, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nephrology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Robert M. Perkins, MD, Nephrology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, WA 98431
  • ,
  • Matthew C. Aboudara, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nephrology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Alice L. Uy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nephrology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, WA
  • ,
  • Stephen W. Olson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nephrology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Howard M. Cushner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nephrology Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, WA
  • ,
  • Christina M. Yuan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Nephrology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC

Received 27 July 2008; accepted 12 November 2008. published online 13 February 2009.

Background

Pentoxifylline is a nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor with anti-inflammatory properties. It reduces proteinuria in patients with glomerular disease, although its impact on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is unknown. We hypothesized that pentoxifylline would slow the estimated GFR decrease in patients with chronic kidney disease at high risk of progression.

Study Design

Pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Setting & Participants

40 outpatients with decreased GFR, hypertension, and proteinuria greater than 1 g/24 h currently treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or the combination and followed up in a nephrology clinic at a tertiary medical care facility.

Intervention

Pentoxifylline, 400 mg twice daily, or matching placebo.

Outcomes

Difference in rates of estimated GFR change during the 1-year study period between the 2 groups.

Measurements

Estimated GFR (4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation) and proteinuria by 24-hour urine collection were assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months after enrollment.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. At 1 year, the mean estimated GFR decrease was significantly less in the pentoxifylline group than the placebo group (−1.2 ± 7.0 versus −7.2 ± 8.2 mL/min/1.73 m2/y; mean difference, −6.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/y; 95% confidence interval, −11.4 to −0.6; P = 0.03). For pentoxifylline-treated participants, the mean estimated GFR decrease during treatment was slower compared with the year before study enrollment (−9.6 ± 11.9 mL/min/1.73 m2/y; mean difference, −8.4 mL/min/1.73 m2/y; 95% confidence interval, −14.8 to −2.1; P = 0.01). Proteinuria was not different between the pentoxifylline and placebo groups at baseline, 6 months, or 1 year.

Limitations

Small sample size and incomplete follow-up.

Conclusions

Pentoxifylline may slow the estimated GFR decrease in high-risk patients. This may be independent of its antiproteinuric properties and warrants further investigation.

Index Words: Chronic kidney disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, pentoxifylline, proteinuria, hypertension

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov; study number: NCT00285298.

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.026 on February 13, 2009.

PII: S0272-6386(08)01761-7

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.026

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 4 , Pages 606-616, April 2009