American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 6 , Pages 1042-1049, June 2009

Effect of Increasing Dialyzer Mass Transfer Area Coefficient and Dialysate Flow on Clearance of Protein-Bound Solutes: A Pilot Crossover Trial

  • Frank J.-G. Luo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Frank J.-G. Luo, MD, Nephrology 111R, Palo Alto VAHCS, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94303
  • ,
  • Kajal P. Patel, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
  • ,
  • Ilian O. Marquez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
  • ,
  • Natalie S. Plummer, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
  • ,
  • Thomas H. Hostetter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Timothy W. Meyer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Received 24 August 2008; accepted 14 January 2009. published online 27 April 2009.

Background

Protein-bound solutes are poorly cleared by means of conventional hemodialysis because protein binding limits the “free” solute concentration driving diffusion. This study tested the modeled prediction that clearances of bound solutes could be increased by increasing the dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient (KoA) and dialysate flow (Qd) to greater than the levels used in conventional practice.

Study Design

Pilot crossover trial.

Setting & Participants

6 stable long-term hemodialysis patients.

Intervention

Study participants underwent an experimental dialysis treatment in which KoA and Qd were increased by using 2 dialyzers in series and supplying each dialyzer with a Qd of 800 mL/min by using 2 dialysis machines. Experimental clearances were compared with those during a conventional treatment with a single dialyzer and Qd of 800 mL/min supplied by 1 machine.

Outcomes

Measured clearances of uremic solutes.

Measurements

Clearances were measured for urea nitrogen and the bound solutes p-cresol sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, kynurenic acid, and hippurate.

Results

Clearances for the bound solutes during conventional treatment were lower than for urea nitrogen (clearance values: urea nitrogen, 255 ± 16 mL/min; p-cresol sulfate, 23 ± 4 mL/min; indoxyl sulfate, 30 ± 7 mL/min; kynurenic acid, 43 ± 4 mL/min; and hippurate, 115 ± 11 mL/min). Experimental treatment increased clearances of all solutes (clearance values: urea nitrogen, 318 ± 19 mL/min; p-cresol sulfate, 37 ± 6 mL/min; indoxyl sulfate, 46 ± 8 mL/min; kynurenic acid, 73 ± 7 mL/min; and hippurate, 165 ± 17 mL/min). The magnitude of the increases in clearance was greater for bound solutes than for urea nitrogen (increase in clearance: urea nitrogen, 25% ± 6%; p-cresol sulfate, 66% ± 19%; indoxyl sulfate, 57% ± 27%; kynurenic acid, 69% ± 5%; and hippurate, 44% ± 15%).

Limitations

A longer term study would be required to determine whether increased dialytic clearance of bound solutes leads to a decrease in plasma solute levels.

Conclusions

Dialytic clearance of protein-bound solutes can be increased by increasing KoA and Qd to greater than conventional levels.

Index Words: Clearance, hemodialysis, protein-bound solutes

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.01.265 on April 27, 2009.

PII: S0272-6386(09)00437-5

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.01.265

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 53, Issue 6 , Pages 1042-1049, June 2009