| | Anabolic Interventions in ESRD: Light at the End of the Tunnel? published online 26 June 2009. Commentary on Nass R, Pezzoli SS, Oliveri MC, et al: Effects of an oral ghrelin mimetic on body composition and clinical outcomes in healthy older adults: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 149:601-611, 2008. Among multiple factors associated with increased risk of mortality in long-term dialysis patients, markers of poor nutritional status, such as low body weight, lower serum creatinine concentration, and, particularly, low serum albumin level, represent some of the strongest ones.1, 2 This is not unexpected because 20% to 50% of long-term dialysis patients have multiple metabolic and nutritional derangements, a condition collectively termed protein-energy wasting (PEW). PEW is accompanied by a decrease in fat-free mass and visceral protein concentrations.3 Based on several studies, there are a number of common pathways leading to PEW in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD; Fig 1). For example, decreased appetite, increased resting energy expenditure, and increased concentrations of inflammatory cytokines are observed in most, if not all, long-term dialysis patients.3, 5, 6 Several disease-specific factors, such as decreased production of and acquired resistance to anabolic hormones, metabolic acidosis, insulin resistance, inefficient nutrient utilization, or increased metabolic activity, also may contribute to PEW. Furthermore, dialysis treatment–related factors, such as loss of nutrients7 and increased inflammation, particularly in patients dialyzed with a catheter,8 also may have a role in PEW. Regardless of its etiology, the common pathway for all the metabolic derangements leading to PEW is exaggerated protein degradation relative to protein synthesis, with a resultant progressive decrease in muscle mass and function9 manifested along with other indices of PEW, such as low albumin concentration. Importantly, PEW is associated with significant deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).10, 11 Most therapeutic strategies to combat the PEW observed in dialysis patients have focused on improving anabolism, including the provision of oral and parenteral nutritional supplements and anabolic hormone therapy, in the hope that an increase in muscle mass will also result in improvement in HRQoL. For example, numerous reports indicate that treatment with growth hormone (GH) improves markers of body protein stores, such as lean body mass and serum albumin levels, as well as HRQoL.12 Ghrelin is a peptide that activates neurons of the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, an area important in the regulation of feeding. Ghrelin also is an endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue receptor type 1a. Parenteral or oral administration of a ghrelin-mimetic GH secretagogue has been shown to restore GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in older persons to levels seen in young adults.13 Ghrelin provides further benefit in muscle-wasting conditions through its appetite-stimulating (orexigenic) and anti-inflammatory effects.13, 14 These distinct properties make ghrelin and ghrelin analogues part of an attractive therapeutic strategy for the treatment of PEW in patients with such chronic disease states as CKD. A recent publication by Nass et al15 in the Annals of Internal Medicine describes a clinical trial of a ghrelin mimetic in healthy individuals older than 60 years. We review this trial and discuss the implications for patients with CKD. What Does This Important Study Show?  Nass et al15 studied the effects of MK-677, a ghrelin mimetic, on age-associated changes in body composition. This was a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, modified-crossover clinical trial in which 65 healthy men and women 60 to 81 years of age received 25 mg of MK-677 or placebo each morning. The primary outcome measurements at 1 year included 24-hour GH secretory profiles, morning IGF-1 serum concentrations, fat-free mass, and abdominal visceral fat. Secondary outcome measures included various other body composition, endocrine-metabolic profile, strength, physical performance, and quality-of-life measures. Results of the study were very intriguing in that after 1 year, daily administration of MK-677 significantly increased GH and IGF-1 to levels of healthy young adults without serious adverse effects. This was accompanied by statistically significant increases in fat-free total body and limb mass and intracellular water (consistent with an increase in cell mass) in the group receiving MK-677, whereas all those parameters showed an additional decrease in the group receiving placebo. Body weight increased 0.8 kg (confidence interval, −0.3 to 1.8) in the placebo group and 2.7 kg (confidence interval, 2.0 to 3.5 kg) in the MK-677 group (P = 0.003). In contrast, there were no significant differences in total and abdominal fat, although the average increase in limb fat (as well as fat-free mass) was greater in the MK-677 group than the placebo group (1.1 vs. 0.24 kg; P = 0.001), consistent with redistribution of fat deposits from the abdomen to periphery. The statistically significant increase in fat-free mass was accompanied by improvements in muscle strength and function (when corrected for baseline muscle mass). Secondary analyses further showed that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased slightly, whereas cortisol, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c levels increased in the group receiving MK-677. In addition, the QUICKI index of insulin sensitivity16 decreased slightly and appetite and body weight increased somewhat in the MK-677 group. Two-year exploratory analyses were performed in a subset of 53 of 65 participants, which confirmed the 1-year results such that the GH, IGF-1, and fat-free mass changes persisted. Interestingly, in participants treated for 2 years with MK-677, fasting blood glucose values were no longer increased. Concentrations of IGF-1 returned to normal after study completion. Limitations of this study include the small sample size, possible confounding effects of sex or hormone replacement therapy, and limited clinically relevant outcome measures. How Does This Study Compare With Other Studies?  Patients with CKD have low circulating levels of certain anabolic hormones (eg, testosterone), increased levels of some catabolic hormones (cortisol), and resistance to other anabolic hormones (ie, GH). It therefore is reasonable to speculate that pharmacological doses of anabolic hormones could be of potential value in treating the PEW of maintenance dialysis patients. Johansen et al17 showed that treatment with nandrolone decanoate led to significant improvements in quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area and an increase in whole-body lean body mass and physical functioning. In light of a recent study showing a significant inverse correlation between testosterone levels and mortality in long-term dialysis patients,18 additional studies are needed to assess the implications of long-term nandrolone treatment in this population. Acquired resistance to the anabolic actions of GH is another potential cause of increased net protein catabolism in dialysis patients.3 A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 26-week, proof-of-concept clinical trial in 139 adult long-term dialysis patients showed that GH led to statistically significant gains in lean body mass compared with placebo.19 Statistically significant beneficial changes in other (cardiovascular) biomarkers of mortality (homocysteine, transferrin, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and HRQoL were observed. There was also a trend (P = 0.06) toward increased levels of serum albumin compared with placebo. This promising phase 2 trial was followed by a large-scale 2-year clinical trial (the OPPORTUNITY Study; ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00503698) testing whether GH would produce improvements in mortality. OPPORTUNITY was prematurely terminated, but not for reasons of any adverse outcomes.20 Ghrelin or ghrelin mimetics also potentially could be of great value compared with other anabolic agents in long-term dialysis patients. Epidemiological studies indicate that plasma des-acyl and total ghrelin concentrations are markedly increased in long-term dialysis patients, possibly because of impaired clearance or metabolism of ghrelin.21 In these patients, total and active plasma ghrelin levels are increased, particularly in anorexic patients, and correlate with fat mass, plasma insulin, and serum leptin levels.22 Abnormally increased total and active ghrelin levels are decreased after a single course of hemodialysis, and increases in body fat mass observed in peritoneal dialysis patients correlate with decreases in plasma ghrelin levels.13 In an experimental study, administration of ghrelin and 2 synthetic ghrelin-receptor agonists (BIM-28125 and BIM-28131) increased food intake, attenuated muscle protein degradation, and decreased circulating inflammatory cytokine levels in nephrectomized animals.23 There also are preliminary studies of subcutaneous ghrelin administration in long-term dialysis patients. Wynne et al24 administered subcutaneous ghrelin (3.6 nmol/kg) and saline placebo in a randomized double-blind crossover protocol to 9 peritoneal dialysis patients with mild to moderate PEW. Administration of subcutaneous ghrelin significantly increased short-term food intake (690 ± 190 versus 440 ± 250 kcal; P = 0.0062) without significant side effects.24 What Should Clinicians and Researchers Do?  The clinical importance of PEW in patients with CKD and potential improvements from the use of anabolic interventions should make such trials a priority. Among several potential candidates, ghrelin and ghrelin mimetics appear to be of great potential value to achieve this goal, at least in long-term dialysis patients who have apparent PEW unresponsive to conventional therapies. The GH-like properties of ghrelin combined with its orexigenic and anti-inflammatory effects make it a unique drug to combat this multifaceted PEW syndrome that is so evident in these patients. The study by Nass et al15 provides exciting data to support this hypothesis. Clinical studies exploring the efficacy and feasibility of ghrelin or ghrelin mimetics are greatly needed in this high-risk patient population. Acknowledgements  Financial Disclosure: Dr Hakim is a full-time employee of Fresenius Medical Care, which produces dialysis-related products and services. Dr Ikizler is co-chair of the steering committee of a study organized by Novo Nordisk on the use of GH in dialysis patients and Dr Hakim coordinated the study in Fresenius Medical Services sites. Dr Ikizler reports having received unrestricted grants from Medical Nutrition Inc and Fresenius Medical Care Inc. Neither author has any activity or financial interest in ghrelin or Merck, which sponsored the study in Annals. References  1. 1Lowrie E, Lew N. Death risk in hemodialysis patients: The predictive value of commonly measured variables and an evaluation of death rate differences between facilities. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;15:458–482. Abstract 2. 2Kopple J, Zhu X, Lew N, Lowrie E. Body weight-for-height relationships predict mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1136–1148. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
3. 3Ikizler TA, Hakim RM. Nutrition in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 1996;50:343–357. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
4. 4Fouque D, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple J, et al. A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2008;73:391–398.
CrossRef
5. 5Ikizler TA, Wingard RL, Harvell J, et al. Association of morbidity with markers of nutrition and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis patients: A prospective study. Kidney Int. 1999;55:1945–1951. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
6. 6Ikizler TA, Wingard RL, Sun M, et al. Increased energy expenditure in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:2646–2653. MEDLINE 7. 7Ikizler T, Flakoll P, Parker R, Hakim R. Amino acid and albumin losses during hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1994;46:830–837. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
8. 8Ikizler TA. Nutrition, inflammation and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2008;17:162–167.
CrossRef
9. 9Motil KJ, Matthews DE, Bier DM, et al. Whole-body leucine and lysine metabolism: Response to dietary protein intake in young men. Am J Physiol. 1981;240:E712–E721. MEDLINE 10. 10Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH. Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:2797–2806. MEDLINE 11. 11Unruh M, Benz R, Greene T, et al. Effects of hemodialysis dose and membrane flux on health-related quality of life in the HEMO Study. Kidney Int. 2004;66:355–366. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
12. 12Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH. A malnutrition-inflammation score is correlated with morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1251–1263. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (118 KB)
|
CrossRef
13. 13Kamiji MM, Inui A. The role of ghrelin and ghrelin analogues in wasting disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008;11:443–451.
CrossRef
14. 14Granado M, Martin AI, Lopez-Menduina M, et al. GH-releasing peptide-2 administration prevents liver inflammatory response in endotoxemia. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;294:E131–E141.
CrossRef
15. 15Nass R, Pezzoli SS, Oliveri MC, et al. Effects of an oral ghrelin mimetic on body composition and clinical outcomes in healthy older adults: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:601–611. 16. 16Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, et al. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: A simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in human. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2402–2410.
CrossRef
17. 17Johansen KL, Painter PL, Sakkas GK, et al. Effects of resistance exercise training and nandrolone decanoate on body composition and muscle function among patients who receive hemodialysis: A randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2307–2314. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
18. 18Carrero JJ, Qureshi AR, Parini P, et al. Low serum testosterone increases mortality risk among male dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:613–620.
CrossRef
19. 19Feldt-Rasmussen B, Lange M, Sulowicz W, et al. Growth hormone treatment during hemodialysis in a randomized trial improves nutrition, quality of life, and cardiovascular risk. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2161–2171. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
20. 20Kopple JD, Cheung AK, Sandahl Christiansen J, et al. OPPORTUNITY: A randomized clinical trial of growth hormone on outcome in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:1741–1751. 21. 21Yoshimoto A, Mori K, Sugawara A, et al. Plasma ghrelin and desacyl ghrelin concentrations in renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2748–2752. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
22. 22Rodriguez Ayala E, Pecoits-Filho R, Heimburger O, et al. Associations between plasma ghrelin levels and body composition in end-stage renal disease: A longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:421–426. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
23. 23DeBoer MD, Zhu X, Levasseur PR, et al. Ghrelin treatment of chronic kidney disease: Improvements in lean body mass and cytokine profile. Endocrinology. 2008;149:827–835.
CrossRef
24. 24Wynne K, Giannitsopoulou K, Small CJ, et al. Subcutaneous ghrelin enhances acute food intake in malnourished patients who receive maintenance peritoneal dialysis: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:2111–2118. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
a Fresenius Medical Care–North America, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee b Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee Address correspondence to Raymond M. Hakim, MD, PhD, Fresenius Medical Care, 750 Old Hickory Blvd, Ste 230, Brentwood, TN 37027
PII: S0272-6386(09)00718-5 doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.018 © 2009 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved. | |
|