American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 54, Issue 6 , Pages 1162-1166, December 2009

Young Man With Kidney Failure and Hemorrhagic Interstitial Nephritis

  • Anja Große Lordemann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Anja Große Lordemann, MD, Clinic of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Brian Hjelle, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Departments of Pathology, Biology, and Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
  • ,
  • Dirk Theegarten, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Florian Grabellus, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Kurt Werner Schmid, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Peter F. Hoyer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Udo Vester, MD

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • ,
  • Jan U. Becker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    • Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Received 3 December 2008; accepted 17 April 2009. published online 26 June 2009.

Article Outline

Index Words: Hantavirus, interstitial nephritis, nephropathia epidemica

 

Hantaviruses, which are single-stranded negative-sense RNA viruses, make up a genus of the family Bunyaviridae. They are prevalent in the Americas, Europe, and Asia, but not in Australia. Beginning with the American Civil War, later in World War I and II, and then in the Korean War in the 1950s and the wars in former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, hantaviruses have had a long history linked to trench warfare and associated contact with rodent reservoirs (reviewed in1). Hantaviruses were identified first as pathogens in the course of their isolation in 1978 by Lee et al,2 and today, at least 30 serotypes that differ in geographic distribution, rodent reservoirs, and clinical features are known (reviewed in3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Although hantaviruses in North and South America cause hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome, hantaviruses in Asia and Europe usually cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS).

The most prevalent serotypes in Europe are Dobrava (which causes the most severe clinical manifestations) and Puumala (which causes the mildest form of HFRS, nephropathia epidemica). After incubation of approximately 2 to 3 weeks, a multiphasic illness begins. The first phase, with a duration of 3 to 7 days, is characterized by fever and pain in the abdomen and back. In the second phase, lasting from a few hours to 2 days, proteinuria develops and is accompanied by capillary leakage and hemorrhage. In the third or oliguric phase, nausea, vomiting, and acute kidney injury with hypovolemia develop. Patients who die of HFRS most often do so in the second and third phases. In the fourth, or polyuric, phase, which lasts from days to weeks, diuresis resumes. In this phase, the patient is threatened by shifts in fluid and electrolytes. In the fifth phase, which has a duration of 2 to 3 months, complete recovery of kidney function usually occurs (reviewed in3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13).

HFRS is a mostly benign self-limiting disease. However, fatal cases and such severe complications as Guillain-Barré and empty sella syndrome have been reported.14 Some patients are left with mild, but long-term, decreases in kidney function.15 A recent study showed that although patients had a slight decrease in glomerular filtration rate and mild proteinuria 5 years after developing nephropathia epidemica, these features disappeared after an additional 5 years. Patients still showed a propensity to develop hypertension in later life.16

Back to Article Outline

Case Report 

Clinical History 

A previously healthy 14-year-old boy experienced an episode of high fever (temperature, 104°F [40°C]), headache, nausea, and lumbar pain for several days. Because of suspected encephalitis, he was admitted to the hospital, but cerebrospinal fluid testing and brain magnetic resonance imaging showed normal results.

Initial laboratory findings were a low platelet count of 108 × 103/μL (108 × 109/L) with a normal hemoglobin level of 16.1 g/dL (161 g/L) and normal white blood cell count of 8 × 103/μL (8 × 109/L). The initial serum creatinine level of 0.75 mg/dL (66.3 μmol/L) and creatinine clearance calculated by using the Schwartz equation of 135 mL/min (2.25 mL/s) were normal. However, on day 5, serum creatinine level increased to 3.9 mg/dL (344.8 μmol/L), lactate dehydrogenase level was increased at 318 U/L, and platelet count decreased to 80 × 103/μL (80 × 109/L). Acute kidney injury was diagnosed, and the patient was referred to the Clinic of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.

On arrival, the patient was normotensive and afebrile. Except for diffuse lumbar pain, findings on physical examination were normal. Laboratory studies confirmed thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 88 × 103/μL [88 × 109/L]) and acute kidney injury (serum creatinine, 4.2 mg/dL [371.3 μmol/L]; creatinine clearance, 24 mL/min [0.4 mL/s]). The patient had proteinuria with protein of 2 g/d and microscopic hematuria. Kidney ultrasound showed enlarged kidneys with a total kidney volume of 820 mL (reference value, 310 mL). A kidney biopsy was performed on day 5 after the onset of symptoms.

Kidney Biopsy 

On examination with a stereo microscope, a portion of the 2 biopsy cores was intensely red. In paraffin sections, the microscopic correlate for this finding was massive interstitial hemorrhage confined to the medulla and corticomedullary junction (Fig 1). In this area, capillaries were either congested or ruptured and endothelial cells were either swollen or absent. The interstitium was edematous and moderately infiltrated by lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages, as well as neutrophils and a very few eosinophils. Intraepithelial infiltrates were not apparent (Fig 2). The cortical tubular epithelial cytoplasm was flattened and had lost its brush borders. In contrast, tubular basement membranes, surrounding interstitium, and glomeruli were virtually normal (Fig 3). No immunoglobulin or complement deposits were found on immunohistochemical staining of the paraffin-embedded material. Additional immunohistochemistry (IHC) for hantavirus antigen, performed at the Department of Pathology at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, was negative. Ultrastructural examination did not show immune deposits or viral particles. Foot processes of the podocytes were well preserved, the endothelium in glomeruli and cortical peritubular capillaries was unremarkable, and the specimen did not contain medulla.

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 1. 

    Tubulointerstitial hemorrhage and infiltrate in the medulla (upper core); the cortex (lower core) shows no hemorrhage, only widened tubular lumina indicative of acute tubular damage (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification ×25).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 2. 

    Medulla with congested and ruptured capillaries, edema, interstitial hemorrhage, and moderate infiltrate of lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and few eosinophils. Note the absence of intraepithelial infiltrates (hematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification ×200).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 3. 

    Virtually normal glomerulus and preglomerular vessel (left). Cortical tubules with flattened epithelium and attenuated brush border indicating acute tubular damage. Note the absence of hemorrhage and inflammatory infiltrates in this portion of the midcortex (periodic acid–Schiff stain; original magnification ×200).

Diagnosis 

A diagnosis of acute medullary hemorrhagic interstitial nephritis with acute tubular damage, suggestive of acute hantavirus nephritis, was made. Acute hantavirus infection was confirmed serologically by means of Western blot of the patient's serum against recombinant antigens of the Puumala serotype; isotype-specific conjugates were used to confirm positive immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G signals. Further questioning showed that the patient lives in a rural area and frequently comes into contact with bank voles when cleaning mouse traps at his parents' house. Bank voles are the main reservoir of hantavirus in this region of Germany; therefore, he most likely caught the infection by inhalation of aerosolized hantavirus particles.

Clinical Follow-up 

Kidney function recovered fully within 10 days and kidney volume decreased to normal. Two years after the infection, the patient remains well. He is normotensive and does not have renal sequelae, with a creatinine clearance of 170 mL/min (2.8 mL/s, calculated by using the Schwartz equation).

Back to Article Outline

Discussion 

Despite our inability to detect hantavirus antigens in the kidney, the present case is a typical example of HFRS. As a clinical teaching point, the combination of thrombocytopenia, fever, loin pain, and acute kidney injury in patients with potential contact with mice or other rodents (camping trips, living in rural areas, and so on) should alert physicians to the possibility of hantavirus nephritis.

In terms of pathology, the present case covers the differential diagnosis of hemorrhagic interstitial nephritis. Several infectious and noninfectious conditions are on the list of differential diagnoses (Box 1). Other infectious nephritides to be considered are kidney involvement in leptospirosis and rickettsiosis, and in other clinical settings and areas, also infections with other RNA viruses from the hemorrhagic fever group, such as Marburg, Ebola, Dengue-fever virus, or flaviridae. Kidney histological findings in patients with leptospirosis and rickettsiosis are poorly defined in the literature, and these diagnoses should be excluded by means of serological or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. According to our limited experience with histological characteristics of hantavirus nephritis and leptospirosis, both are similar in the composition of the inflammatory infiltrate and in having peritubular capillaritis without significant tubulitis. Usually, the amount of hemorrhage is more extensive in hantavirus nephritis and the infiltrate spares the cortex, in contrast to kidney involvement in leptospirosis.

Box 1. Causes of Hemorrhagic Interstitial Nephritis

 


Infection

Hantavirus nephritis

Leptospirosis

Rickettsiosis

Other hemorrhagic fever RNA viruses

Acute or hyperacute humoral rejection

Hemorrhagic margin of anemic renal infarct

Hemorrhagic renal infarct

Injury from previous needle biopsy or other procedures

In kidney transplant recipients, the differential diagnosis between acute cellular rejection (with hemorrhage as an indicator of a humoral rejection component) and hantavirus nephritis can be challenging.17 Interstitial hemorrhage is a rare feature of acute humoral rejection and can be ruled out by means of negative C4d stains, negative serological test results for panel-reactive antibodies, and lack of such additional histological findings suggestive of acute humoral rejection as transplant glomerulitis. Also, the observation that the area of hemorrhage is confined to the medulla and corticomedullary junction in hantavirus nephritis should help exclude acute humoral rejection, in which there is both medullary and cortical hemorrhage. The latter feature also distinguishes hantavirus nephritis from hemorrhagic margins of anemic and hemorrhagic infarcts caused by renal vein thrombosis, which also involve both the cortex and medulla. Focal inflammation and hemorrhage also can result from needle tracks from previous biopsies or injury from other procedures; such causes are best ruled out by reviewing the medical history.

The diagnosis of HFRS can also be confirmed by using PCR, even on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded kidney biopsy specimens.18 IHC of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded kidney tissue can be performed only in reference pathology departments because appropriate diagnostic antibodies are not available commercially. The majority of the experience with diagnostic detection of hantavirus RNA by using reverse-transcription PCR or hantavirus antigens by using IHC has been obtained by using necropsy-derived samples from patients who died of infection caused by Sin Nombre virus or Andes hantavirus. In the case of Sin Nombre virus infections that led to the patient's rapid death, the sensitivity of either IHC or reverse-transcription PCR is believed to approximate 100%. However, the sensitivity of staining or reverse-transcription PCR studies with milder infections caused by HFRS-associated hantaviruses or any infection for which the biopsy sample is collected outside the earliest times relative to the onset of symptoms may be relatively reduced17, 19 and may explain the negative result in our case.

Hantaviruses enter cells through β3 integrin, which is present on platelets, macrophages, and endothelial cells. The inflammatory infiltrate typically is mild and consists of plasma cells, T lymphocytes (more CD8+ than CD4+), and a few CD22+ B lymphocytes, as well as macrophages, eosinophils, and neutrophils.20, 21 Endothelial damage is believed to occur primarily from immune mechanisms and not viral cytopathic effects and explains the characteristic hemorrhage. Interestingly, despite the massive endothelial damage, capillary thrombi are not a typical feature of hantavirus nephritis. The reason for the proteinuria in patients with HFRS is still unclear. The normal ultrastructural appearance of glomerular endothelium and podocytes and lack of the mesangial immunoglobulin M and C1q staining we usually observe in patients with glomerular proteinuria lead us to speculate that the observed proteinuria is caused by leakage from the injured peritubular capillaries in the medulla.

In summary, hemorrhagic interstitial nephritis confined to the medulla and corticomedullary junction is highly suggestive of hantavirus nephritis, and this diagnosis can be confirmed by means of serological tests22 or direct demonstration of the virus by using IHC or PCR.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

Support: Dr Hjelle is the recipient of US Public Health Service Grant UO1 AI56618.

Financial Disclosure: This work was supported by Forschungsunterstützungskreis Kindernephrologie e. V., Essen, Germany.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Clement JP. Hantavirus. Antiviral Res. 2003;57:121–127
  2. Lee HW, Lee PW, Johnson KM. Isolation of the etiologic agent of Korean hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis. 1978;137:298–308
  3. Hjelle B, Jenison SA, Goade DE, Green WB, Feddersen RM, Scott AA. Hantaviruses: Clinical, microbiologic, and epidemiologic aspects. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1995;32:469–508
  4. McCaughey C, Hart CA. Hantaviruses. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:587–599
  5. Lednicky JA. Hantaviruses: A short review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:30–35
  6. Lokugamage K, Kariwa H, Lokugamage N, et al. Genetic and antigenic characterization of the Amur virus associated with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Virus Res. 2004;101:127–134
  7. Baek LJ, Kariwa H, Lokugamage K, et al. Soochong virus: An antigenically and genetically distinct hantavirus isolated from Apodemus peninsulae in Korea. J Med Virol. 2006;78:290–297
  8. Bahr U, Zeier M, Muranyi W. Characterization of a new Puumala virus genotype associated with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Virus Genes. 2006;33:229–234
  9. Maes P, Clement J, Gavrilovskaya I, Van Ranst M. Hantaviruses: Immunology, treatment, and prevention. Viral Immunol. 2004;17:481–497
  10. Vapalahti O, Mustonen J, Lundkvist A, Henttonen H, Plyusnin A, Vaheri A. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:653–661
  11. Faulde M, Sobe D, Kimmig P, Scharninghausen J. Renal failure and hantavirus infection in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15:751–753
  12. Muranyi W, Bahr U, Zeier M, van der Woude FJ. Hantavirus infection. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3669–3679
  13. Ulrich R, Hjelle B, Pitra C, Kruger DH. Emerging viruses: The case 'hantavirus'. Intervirology. 2002;45:318–327
  14. Forslund T, Saltevo J, Anttinen J, et al. Complications of nephropathia epidemica: Three cases. J Intern Med. 1992;232:87–90
  15. Novo R, Gagnadoux MF, Le Guenno Y, et al. Chronic renal failure after Puumala virus infection. Pediatr Nephrol. 1999;13:934–935
  16. Miettinen MH, Makela SM, Ala-Houhala IO, et al. Ten-year prognosis of Puumala hantavirus-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2006;69:2043–2048
  17. Zaki SR, Greer PW, Coffield LM, et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (Pathogenesis of an emerging infectious disease). Am J Pathol. 1995;146:552–579
  18. Heiske A, Anheier B, Pilaski J, Klenk HD, Grone HJ, Feldmann H. Polymerase chain reaction detection of Puumala virus RNA in formaldehyde-fixed biopsy material. Kidney Int. 1999;55:2062–2069
  19. Hjelle B, Spiropoulou CF, Torrez-Martinez N, Morzunov S, Peters CJ, Nichol ST. Detection of Muerto Canyon virus RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:1013–1017
  20. Ivanov AP, Tkachenko EA, Petrov VA, et al. Enzyme immuno assay for the detection of virus specific IgG and IgM antibody in patients with haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Arch Virol. 1988;100:1–7
  21. Mustonen J, Helin H, Pietila K, et al. Renal biopsy findings and clinicopathologic correlations in nephropathia epidemica. Clin Nephrol. 1994;41:121–126
  22. Temonen M, Mustonen J, Helin H, Pasternack A, Vaheri A, Holthofer H. Cytokines, adhesion molecules, and cellular infiltration in nephropathia epidemica kidneys: An immunohistochemical study. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1996;78:47–55

 Originally published online as doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.025 on June 26, 2009.

PII: S0272-6386(09)00756-2

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.025

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 54, Issue 6 , Pages 1162-1166, December 2009