Journal Home
Search for

Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 205-226 (August 2009)


View previous. 6 of 40 View next.

Proteinuria as a Surrogate Outcome in CKD: Report of a Scientific Workshop Sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration

Andrew S. Levey, MD1, Daniel Cattran, MD2, Aaron Friedman, MD3, W. Greg Miller, PhD4, John Sedor, MD5, Katherine Tuttle, MD6, Bertram Kasiske, MD7, Thomas Hostetter, MD8

Received 7 February 2009; accepted 13 April 2009. published online 06 July 2009.

Changes in proteinuria have been suggested as a surrogate outcome for kidney disease progression to facilitate the conduct of clinical trials. This report summarizes a workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the following goals: (1) to evaluate the strengths and limitations of criteria for assessment of proteinuria as a potential surrogate end point for clinical trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD), (2) to explore the strengths and limitations of available data for proteinuria as a potential surrogate end point, and (3) to delineate what more needs to be done to evaluate proteinuria as a potential surrogate end point. We review the importance of proteinuria in CKD, including the conceptual model for CKD, measurement of proteinuria and albuminuria, and epidemiological characteristics of albuminuria in the United States. We discuss surrogate end points in clinical trials of drug therapy, including criteria for drug approval, the definition of a surrogate end point, and criteria for evaluation of surrogacy based on biological plausibility, epidemiological characteristics, and clinical trials. Next, the report summarizes data for proteinuria as a potential surrogate outcome in 3 broad clinical areas: early diabetic kidney disease, nephrotic syndrome, and diseases with mild to moderate proteinuria. We conclude with a synthesis of data and recommendations for further research. At the present time, there appears to be sufficient evidence to recommend changes in proteinuria as a surrogate for kidney disease progression in only selected circumstances. Further research is needed to define additional contexts in which changes in proteinuria can be expected to predict treatment effect. We recommend collaboration among many groups, including academia, industry, the FDA, and the National Institutes of Health, to share data from past and future studies.

1 Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA

2 Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

3 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

4 Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

5 Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

6 University of Washington, Seattle and Spokane, WA

7 Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN

8 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

 Originally published online as doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.029 on July 6, 2009.

 Because an author of this manuscript is an editor for AJKD, the peer-review and decision-making processes were handled entirely by an Associate Editor (Rulan Parekh, MD, MS, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions) who served as Acting Editor-in-Chief. Details of the journal's procedures for potential editor conflicts are given in the Editorial Policies section of the AJKD website.

 Reprint requests to: Kerry Willis, PhD, National Kidney Foundation, 30 E 33rd St, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: kerryw@kidney.org

PII: S0272-6386(09)00763-X

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.029


View previous. 6 of 40 View next.