American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 352-364, February 2010

Is There a Role for Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition? A Review of the Evidence

  • Ramanath Dukkipati, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance and Los Angeles, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Ramanath Dukkipati, MD, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson St, Torrance, CA 90509
  • ,
  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, MD, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance and Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Joel D. Kopple, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance and Los Angeles, CA
    • UCLA School of Public Health, Torrance and Los Angeles, CA

Received 7 April 2009; accepted 17 August 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is highly prevalent in people with stages 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease, particularly in maintenance dialysis patients, and many indicators of PEW correlate strongly with mortality. Consequently, the causes, prevention, and treatment of PEW are active areas of investigation. A major cause of PEW is insufficient intake of nutrients, especially protein and energy (calories). Standard methods for increasing nutritional intake in patients with chronic kidney disease with PEW include dietary counseling and use of food supplements. If nutrient intake does not increase sufficiently, tube feeding and total parenteral nutrition may be considered. For maintenance hemodialysis patients, intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN), an intravenous infusion of essential nutrients during hemodialysis treatments, may be used. Many studies have evaluated the effectiveness and safety of IDPN and show that IDPN has a good safety profile and also may improve protein-energy status. However, most studies have limitations in experimental design, such as small numbers of patients, lack of adequate controls, inclusion of patients without PEW, uncontrolled or unmonitored oral intake, nonrandomized design, or short duration. Additionally, most studies used nutritional or inflammatory indicators, rather than the more important outcomes of morbidity, mortality, or quality of life. Thus, although IDPN may partially satisfy the nutritional needs of maintenance hemodialysis patients who have or are at risk of PEW and who have substantial, but not adequate, protein and/or energy intake, longer term randomized prospective clinical trials with appropriate control groups are necessary to more definitively evaluate the clinical effectiveness and indications for IDPN.

Index Words: Intradialytic parenteral nutrition, protein energy wasting

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.08.006 on October 26, 2009.

PII: S0272-6386(09)01081-6

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.08.006

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 352-364, February 2010