Journal Home
Search for

Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 77-87 (January 2010)


View previous. 12 of 36 View next.

Short-term Effects of Online Hemodiafiltration on Phosphate Control: A Result From the Randomized Controlled Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST)

CONTRAST InvestigatorsE. Lars Penne, MD, PhD12, Neelke C. van der Weerd, MD12, Marinus A. van den Dorpel, MD, PhD3, Muriel P.C. Grooteman, MD, PhD24, Renée Lévesque, MD5, Menso J. Nubé, MD, PhD24, Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD6, Peter J. Blankestijn, MD, PhD1, Piet M. ter Wee, MD, PhD24Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 6 April 2009; accepted 24 September 2009. published online 07 December 2009.

Background

Hyperphosphatemia is an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Phosphate control often is unsuccessful using conventional dialysis therapies.

Study Design

Short-term analysis of a secondary outcome of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.

Setting & Participants

493 (84%) consecutive patients from 589 patients included in the Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST) by January 2009 from 26 centers in 3 countries.

Intervention

Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus continuation of low-flux HD.

Outcomes

Differences in change from baseline to 6 months in phosphate levels and proportion of patients reaching phosphate treatment targets (phosphate ≤ 5.5 mg/dL).

Measurements

Phosphate, use of phosphate-binding agents, and proportion of patients achieving treatment targets at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Results

Phosphate levels decreased from 5.18 ± 0.10 (SE) mg/dL at baseline to 4.87 ± 0.10 mg/dL at 6 months in HDF patients (P < 0.001) and were stable in HD patients (5.10 ± 0.10 mg/dL at baseline and 5.03 ± 0.10 mg/dL after 6 months; P = 0.5). The difference in change in phosphate levels between HD and HDF patients (B = −0.24; 95% CI, −0.52 to 0.03; P = 0.08) increased after adjustment for phosphate-binder use (B = −0.36; 95% CI, −0.65 to −0.06; P = 0.02). The proportion of patients reaching phosphate treatment targets increased from 64% to 74% in HDF patients and was stable in HD patients (66% and 66%); the difference between groups reached statistical significance (P = 0.04). Nutritional parameters and residual renal function were similar in both treatment groups.

Limitations

Only predialysis serum phosphate levels were measured; phosphate clearance could therefore not be calculated.

Conclusion

HDF may help improve phosphate control. Whether this contributes to improved clinical outcome remains to be established.

1 Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

2 Department of Nephrology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3 Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

4 Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5 Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, St-Luc Hospital, Québec, Canada

6 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Piet M. ter Wee, MD, PhD, Department of Nephrology, VU Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

 A list of the members of the CONTRAST Investigators appears at the end of this article.

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.023 on December 7, 2009.

 Trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; study number: NCT00205556.

PII: S0272-6386(09)01309-2

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.023


View previous. 12 of 36 View next.