American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 291-299, February 2010

Kidney Function and Rate of Bone Loss at the Hip and Spine: The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study

  • Sophie A. Jamal, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Sophie A. Jamal, MD, PhD, 76 Grenville St, Ste 805, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Victoria J.D. Swan, BSc, BPHE

      Affiliations

    • Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Jacques P. Brown, MD

      Affiliations

    • Laval University, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • David A. Hanley, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
  • ,
  • Jerilynn C. Prior, BA, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • ,
  • Alexandra Papaioannou, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • ,
  • Lisa Langsetmo, PhD

      Affiliations

    • McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • ,
  • Robert G. Josse, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group

Received 24 April 2009; accepted 27 October 2009. published online 31 December 2009.

Background

The relationship between kidney function and bone loss is unclear.

Study Design

A prospective observational study.

Setting & Participants

191 men and 444 women aged ≥ 50 years participating in a population-based observational study designed to determine risk factors for bone loss and fractures.

Predictors

The primary predictor of change in bone mineral density (BMD) was estimated creatinine clearance (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula) measured at baseline and stratified by quartiles. Our secondary predictor was estimated glomerular filtration rate using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, also stratified by quartiles.

Outcomes & Measurements

Changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck during 5 years.

Results

Compared with participants in the first quartile of estimated creatinine clearance (>101.2 mL/min), those in remaining quartiles were older (quartile 1, 50.0 years; quartile 2 [101.2-83.4 mL/min], 54.7 years; quartile 3 [83.4-68.3 mL/min], 60.5 years; and quartile 4 [<68.3 mL/min], 68.3 years); weighed less; reported more sedentary hours; were less likely to report excellent, very good, or good self-reported health; consumed less caffeine; and had lower serum calcium and phosphate and higher serum parathyroid hormone levels. After adjusting for age, weight, sex, baseline BMD, and these differences, compared with those in the first quartile, those in the fourth quartile had decreases in BMD of 0.08 g/cm2 (95% CI, 0.04-0.1) at the lumbar spine, 0.08 g/cm2 (95% CI, 0.06-0.1) at the femoral neck, and 0.09 g/cm2 (95% CI, 0.07-0.1) at the total hip. Bone loss did not increase with worsening kidney function (P for trend > 0.05). Results were not substantially different using estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Limitations

Observational study design and indirect measures of kidney function.

Conclusions

Men and women with impaired kidney function are at increased risk of bone loss, even with minimal reduction in kidney function.

Index Words: Impaired kidney function, bone loss, osteoporosis, bone mineral density

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.049 on December 31, 2009.

PII: S0272-6386(09)01447-4

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.049

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 55, Issue 2 , Pages 291-299, February 2010