American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 56, Issue 4 , Pages 713-719, October 2010

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immunization With Combined Hepatitis A and B Versus Hepatitis B Alone for Hepatitis B Seroprotection in Hemodialysis Patients

  • Jennifer Tung, BScPhm

      Affiliations

    • St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Euan Carlisle, MD

      Affiliations

    • McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Marek Smieja, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Peter T. Kim, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Math and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Christine H. Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Christine H Lee, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Received 30 November 2009; accepted 15 April 2010. published online 14 July 2010.

Background

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend immunizing susceptible high-risk groups, such as hemodialysis patients, against hepatitis B virus. However, hemodialysis patients may not develop seroprotective antibodies despite receiving high doses of the vaccine. Recent reports indicate that combined vaccination against hepatitis B and hepatitis A viruses may improve the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in healthy individuals, but the effectiveness of this strategy in hemodialysis patients is unknown.

Study Design

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Setting & Participants

Hepatitis B virus–seronegative hemodialysis patients with undetectable antibody levels at baseline.

Intervention

Intramuscular administration of Twinrix (inactivated hepatitis A virus [720 ELISA units] and purified hepatitis B virus surface antigen [20 μg]; GlaxoSmithKline) and Engerix-B (purified hepatitis B virus surface antigen [20 μg]) at 0, 1, and 6 months plus Engerix-B, 40 μg, at month 2 (intervention arm) or Engerix-B, 40 μg, at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months (control arm). Both groups received a total dose of 160 μg of hepatitis B antigen.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the difference in seroprotection rates at 7 months, defined by antibody titers >10 mIU/mL. The secondary outcome was frequency of adverse events.

Measurements

Antibody response at months 3 and 7.

Results

96 patients were enrolled, and 73 completed the investigation. At 3 months, there was no difference in the groups' seroprotection rates (25% vs 27%; P = 0.4). At the completion of the vaccination series, using per-protocol analysis, 27 of 40 (68%) and 16 of 33 (49%) had antibody titers >10 mIU/mL in the treatment and control groups, respectively (P = 0.05; RR, 1.4; absolute abatement, 19%). Intention-to-treat analysis showed 58% and 38% seroprotection rates in the treatment and control groups, respectively (P = 0.02; RR, 1.5; absolute abatement, 20%). There was no difference in adverse events.

Limitations

Lack of evidence of long-term protection.

Conclusion

Vaccination of hemodialysis patients with a combined hepatitis A and hepatitis B regimen resulted in a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in seroprotection against hepatitis B virus compared with hepatitis B monovalent vaccine.

Index Words: Hepatitis B vaccine, hemodialysis, hepatitis B seroprotection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online as doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.04.015 on July 14, 2010.

 Trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; study number: NCT00186836

PII: S0272-6386(10)00912-1

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.04.015

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 56, Issue 4 , Pages 713-719, October 2010