American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 59, Issue 3 , Pages 400-408, March 2012

Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: A Quality Improvement Report

  • Arshia Ghaffari, DO, MA, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Arshia Ghaffari, DO, MA, MBA, Division of Nephrology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 North State St, Los Angeles, CA 90033

Division of Nephrology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

Received 3 May 2011; accepted 31 August 2011. published online 24 October 2011.

Background

Compared with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a cost-effective and patient-centered option with an early survival advantage, yet only 7% of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States receive PD. PD underutilization is due in part to nephrologists' unfamiliarity with directly starting PD in patients who present with kidney failure requiring urgent initiation of dialysis.

Design

Quality improvement report.

Setting & Participants

Single-center study whereby 18 patients who presented urgently with chronic kidney disease stage 5 without a plan for dialysis modality were offered PD as the initial modality of dialysis. Concurrently, 9 patients started on PD therapy nonurgently were included as the comparative group.

Quality Improvement Plan

An urgent-start PD program was developed to support and standardize the process by which patients without a plan for dialysis modality were started on PD. This included rapid PD access placement, PD nursing education, and administrative support. Standardized protocols were created for modality selection, initial prescription, and prevention and management of complications.

Measures

Short-term (90-day) clinical outcomes (Kt/V, hemoglobin, iron saturation, parathyroid hormone, phosphorus, calcium, and albumin) and complications (peritonitis, exit-site infections, leaks, and catheter malfunction) were compared between the urgent-start and non–urgent-start PD groups.

Results

Short-term clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups for all parameters except uncorrected serum calcium level, which was lower in the urgent-start group (P = 0.02). Peritonitis, exit-site infection, catheter-related complications, and other complications were similar between the 2 groups, although the number of minor leaks was higher in the urgent-start group.

Limitations

This is a single-center nonrandomized study with a small sample size.

Conclusions

Our structured program shows safety and feasibility in starting PD in patients with kidney failure who present without a plan for dialysis modality. The steps laid out in this report can provide the framework for creating local urgent-start PD programs.

Index Words:  Peritoneal dialysis , urgent-start peritoneal dialysis , acute-start peritoneal dialysis , late-start peritoneal dialysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Originally published online October 24, 2011.

PII: S0272-6386(11)01320-5

doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.08.034

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 59, Issue 3 , Pages 400-408, March 2012