Advertisement
American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Factors Influencing the Decision to Start Renal Replacement Therapy: Results of a Survey Among European Nephrologists

Published:August 24, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.015

      Background

      Little is known about the criteria nephrologists use in the decision of when to start renal replacement therapy (RRT) in early referred adult patients. We evaluated opinions of European nephrologists on the decision for when to start RRT.

      Study Design

      European web-based survey.

      Predictors

      Patient presentations described as uncomplicated patients, patients with unfavorable clinical and unfavorable social conditions, or patients with specific clinical, social, and logistical factors.

      Setting & Participants

      Nephrologists from 11 European countries.

      Outcomes & Measurements

      We studied opinions of European nephrologists about the influence of clinical, social, and logistical factors on decision making regarding when to start RRT, reflecting practices in place in 2009. Questions included target levels of kidney function at the start of RRT and factors accelerating or postponing RRT initiation. Using linear regression, we studied determinants of target estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the start of RRT.

      Results

      We received 433 completed surveys. The median target eGFR selected to start RRT in uncomplicated patients was 10.0 (25th-75th percentile, 8.0-10.0) mL/min/1.73 m2. Level of excretory kidney function was considered the most important factor in decision making regarding uncomplicated patients (selected by 54% of respondents); in patients with unfavorable clinical versus social conditions, this factor was selected by 24% versus 32%, respectively. Acute clinical factors such as life-threatening hyperkalemia refractory to medical therapy (100%) and uremic pericarditis (98%) elicited a preference for an immediate start, whereas patient preference (69%) and vascular dementia (66%) postponed the start. Higher target eGFRs were reported by respondents from high- versus low-RRT-incidence countries (10.4 [95% CI, 9.9-10.9] vs 9.1 mL/min/1.73 m2) and from for-profit versus not-for-profit centers (10.1 [95% CI, 9.5-10.7] vs 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2).

      Limitations

      We were unable to calculate the exact response rate and examined opinions rather than practice for 433 nephrologists.

      Conclusions

      Only for uncomplicated patients did half the nephrologists consider excretory kidney function as the most important factor. Future studies should assess the weight of each factor affecting decision making.

      Index Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ginieri-Coccossis M.
        • Theofilou P.
        • Synodinou C.
        • Tomaras V.
        • Soldatos C.
        Quality of life, mental health and health beliefs in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: investigating differences in early and later years of current treatment.
        BMC Nephrol. 2008; 9: 14
        • Hwang S.J.
        • Yang W.C.
        • Lin M.Y.
        • Mau L.W.
        • Chen H.C.
        Impact of the clinical conditions at dialysis initiation on mortality in incident haemodialysis patients: a national cohort study in Taiwan.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25: 2616-2624
        • Clark W.F.
        • Na Y.
        • Rosansky S.J.
        • et al.
        Association between estimated glomerular filtration rate at initiation of dialysis and mortality.
        CMAJ. 2011; 183: 47-53
        • Stel V.S.
        • Dekker F.W.
        • Ansell D.
        • et al.
        Residual renal function at the start of dialysis and clinical outcomes.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24: 3175-3182
        • Traynor J.P.
        • Simpson K.
        • Geddes C.C.
        • Deighan C.J.
        • Fox J.G.
        Early initiation of dialysis fails to prolong survival in patients with end-stage renal failure.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13: 2125-2132
        • Cooper B.A.
        • Branley P.
        • Bulfone L.
        • et al.
        A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 609-619
        • Ledebo I.
        • Kessler M.
        • van Biesen W.
        • et al.
        Initiation of dialysis—opinions from an international survey: Report on the Dialysis Opinion Symposium at the ERA-EDTA Congress, 18 September 2000, Nice.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001; 16: 1132-1138
        • Lameire N.
        • van Biesen W.
        The initiation of renal-replacement therapy—just-in-time delivery.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 678-680
        • ERA-EDTA Registry
        ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report. 2008.
        Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands2010
        • Jager K.J.
        • Zoccali C.
        • Macleod A.
        • Dekker F.W.
        Confounding: what it is and how to deal with it.
        Kidney Int. 2008; 73: 256-260
        • Kessler M.
        • European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association
        Section I.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002; 17: 7-15
        • Beddhu S.
        • Samore M.H.
        • Roberts M.S.
        • Stoddard G.J.
        • Pappas L.M.
        • Cheung A.K.
        Creatinine production, nutrition, and glomerular filtration rate estimation.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14: 1000-1005
        • Fink J.C.
        • Burdick R.A.
        • Kurth S.J.
        • et al.
        Significance of serum creatinine values in new end-stage renal disease patients.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 1999; 34: 694-701
        • Tattersall J.
        • Dekker F.
        • Heimburger O.
        • et al.
        When to start dialysis: updated guidance following publication of the Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL. Study.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 2082-2086
        • Grootendorst D.C.
        • Michels W.M.
        • Richardson J.D.
        • et al.
        The MDRD formula does not reflect GFR in ESRD patients.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 1932-1937
        • Poggio E.D.
        • Wang X.
        • Greene T.
        • Van L.F.
        • Hall P.M.
        Performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 459-466
        • Beddhu S.
        • Samore M.H.
        • Roberts M.S.
        • et al.
        Impact of timing of initiation of dialysis on mortality.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14: 2305-2312
        • Kazmi W.H.
        • Gilbertson D.T.
        • Obrador G.T.
        • et al.
        Effect of comorbidity on the increased mortality associated with early initiation of dialysis.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 46: 887-896
        • Lassalle M.
        • Labeeuw M.
        • Frimat L.
        • et al.
        Age and comorbidity may explain the paradoxical association of an early dialysis start with poor survival.
        Kidney Int. 2010; 77: 700-707
        • Stel V.S.
        • Tomson C.
        • Ansell D.
        • et al.
        Level of renal function in patients starting dialysis: an ERA-EDTA Registry study.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25: 3315-3325
        • van Stralen K.J.
        • Tizard E.J.
        • Jager K.J.
        • et al.
        Determinants of eGFR at start of renal replacement therapy in paediatric patients.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25: 3325-3332
        • Kurella M.
        • Chertow G.M.
        • Luan J.
        • Yaffe K.
        Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52: 1863-1869
        • Madan P.
        • Kalra O.P.
        • Agarwal S.
        • Tandon O.P.
        Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22: 440-444
        • Rakowski D.A.
        • Caillard S.
        • Agodoa L.Y.
        • Abbott K.C.
        Dementia as a predictor of mortality in dialysis patients.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 1: 1000-1005
        • Mulley A.G.
        The need to confront variation in practice.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: 1007-1009
        • Horl W.H.
        • de A.F.
        • Williams P.F.
        Healthcare systems and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies—an international review: access to ESRD treatments.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999; 14: 10-15
        • Caskey F.J.
        • Kramer A.
        • Elliott R.F.
        • et al.
        Global variation in renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 2604-2610
        • Rosansky S.J.
        • Eggers P.
        • Jackson K.
        • Glassock R.
        • Clark W.F.
        Early start of hemodialysis may be harmful.
        Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 396-403
        • Stang A.
        • Jockel K.H.
        Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159: 204-210
        • Hikmet N.
        • Chen S.K.
        An investigation into low mail survey response rates of information technology users in health care organizations.
        Int J Med Inform. 2003; 72: 29-34