Advertisement
American Journal of Kidney Diseases

System-Level Barriers and Facilitators for Foregoing or Withdrawing Dialysis: A Qualitative Study of Nephrologists in the United States and England

Published:February 24, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.015

      Background

      Despite a growing body of literature suggesting that dialysis does not confer morbidity or mortality benefits for all patients with chronic kidney failure, the initiation and continuation of dialysis therapy in patients with poor prognosis is commonplace. Our goal was to elicit nephrologists’ perspectives on factors that affect decision making regarding end-stage renal disease.

      Study Design

      Semistructured, individual, qualitative interviews.

      Methodology

      Participants were purposively sampled based on age, race, sex, geographic location, and practice type. Each was asked about his or her perspectives and experiences related to foregoing and withdrawing dialysis therapy.

      Analytical Approach

      Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using narrative and thematic analysis.

      Results

      We conducted 59 semistructured interviews with nephrologists from the United States (n = 41) and England (n = 18). Most participants were 45 years or younger, men, and white. Average time since completing nephrology training was 14.2 ± 11.6 (SD) years. Identified system-level facilitators and barriers for foregoing and withdrawing dialysis therapy stemmed from national and institutional policies and structural factors, how providers practice medicine (the culture of medicine), and beliefs and behaviors of the public (societal culture). In both countries, the predominant barriers described included lack of training in end-of-life conversations and expectations for aggressive care among non-nephrologists and the general public. Primary differences included financial incentives to dialyze in the United States and widespread outpatient conservative management programs in England.

      Limitations

      Participants’ views may not fully capture those of all American or English nephrologists.

      Conclusions

      Nephrologists in the United States and England identified several system-level factors that both facilitated and interfered with decision making around foregoing and withdrawing dialysis therapy. Efforts to expand facilitators while reducing barriers could lead to care practices more in keeping with patient prognosis.

      Index Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Grubbs V.
        • Moss A.H.
        • Cohen L.M.
        • et al.
        A palliative approach to dialysis care: a patient-centered transition to the end of life.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 9: 2203-2209
        • Vandecasteele S.J.
        • Kurella Tamura M.
        A patient-centered vision of care for ESRD: dialysis as a bridging treatment or as a final destination?.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 25: 1647-1651
        • Kurella M.
        • Covinsky K.E.
        • Collins A.J.
        • Chertow G.M.
        Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States.
        Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 177-183
        • Carson R.C.
        • Juszczak M.
        • Davenport A.
        • Burns A.
        Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease?.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4: 1611-1619
        • Chandna S.M.
        • Da Silva-Gane M.
        • Marshall C.
        • Warwicker P.
        • Greenwood R.N.
        • Farrington K.
        Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 1608-1614
        • Hussain J.A.
        • Mooney A.
        • Russon L.
        Comparison of survival analysis and palliative care involvement in patients aged over 70 years choosing conservative management or renal replacement therapy in advanced chronic kidney disease.
        Palliat Med. 2013; 27: 829-839
        • O'Connor N.R.
        • Kumar P.
        Conservative management of end-stage renal disease without dialysis: a systematic review.
        J Palliat Med. 2012; 15: 228-235
        • Verberne W.R.
        • Geers A.B.
        • Jellema W.T.
        • Vincent H.H.
        • van Delden J.J.
        • Bos W.J.
        Comparative survival among older adults with advanced kidney disease managed conservatively versus with dialysis.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11: 633-640
        • Murtagh F.E.
        • Marsh J.E.
        • Donohoe P.
        • Ekbal N.J.
        • Sheerin N.S.
        • Harris F.E.
        Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22: 1955-1962
        • Smith C.
        • Da Silva-Gane M.
        • Chandna S.
        • Warwicker P.
        • Greenwood R.
        • Farrington K.
        Choosing not to dialyse: evaluation of planned non-dialytic management in a cohort of patients with end-stage renal failure.
        Nephron Clin Pract. 2003; 95: c40-c46
        • Kurella Tamura M.
        • Covinsky K.E.
        • Chertow G.M.
        • Yaffe K.
        • Landefeld C.S.
        • McCulloch C.E.
        Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1539-1547
        • McKenzie J.K.
        • Moss A.H.
        • Feest T.G.
        • Stocking C.B.
        • Siegler M.
        Dialysis decision making in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 1998; 31: 12-18
        • Moss A.H.
        • Stocking C.B.
        • Sachs G.A.
        • Siegler M.
        Variation in the attitudes of dialysis unit medical directors toward decisions to withhold and withdraw dialysis.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993; 4: 229-234
        • Lambie M.
        • Rayner H.C.
        • Bragg-Gresham J.L.
        • et al.
        Starting and withdrawing haemodialysis–associations between nephrologists' opinions, patient characteristics and practice patterns (data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study).
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21: 2814-2820
        • Gubrium J.F.
        • Holstein J.A.
        Analyzing Narrative Reality.
        Sage, Los Angeles, CA2009
        • Josselson R.
        Narrative research: constructing, deconstructing and reconstructing the story.
        in: Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis. Guilford, New York, NY2011: 224-242
        • Braun V.
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Holley J.L.
        • Carmody S.S.
        • Moss A.H.
        • et al.
        The need for end-of-life care training in nephrology: national survey results of nephrology fellows.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2003; 42: 813-820
        • Combs S.A.
        • Culp S.
        • Matlock D.D.
        • Kutner J.S.
        • Holley J.L.
        • Moss A.H.
        Update on end-of-life care training during nephrology fellowship: a cross-sectional national survey of fellows.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 65: 233-239
      1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Nephrology (Internal Medicine). 2016; https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/148_nephrology_int_med_2016.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2016.

      2. Joint Royal Colleges of Physicians Training Board. Specialty Training Curriculum for Renal Medicine. 2012. https://www.jrcptb.org.uk/sites/default/files/2010 Renal Medicine %28amendment 2012%29.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2016.

        • Okamoto I.
        • Tonkin-Crine S.
        • Rayner H.
        • et al.
        Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10: 120-126