American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Patients’ Experiences After CKD Diagnosis: A Meta-ethnographic Study and Systematic Review


      Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often asymptomatic at first diagnosis, and awareness of CKD is low in the general population. Thus, individuals who are unexpectedly identified as having CKD may struggle to adjust to living with this diagnosis. This study aims to synthesize qualitative research exploring patients’ views and experiences of a CKD diagnosis and how they adjust to it.

      Study Design

      Systematic review and meta-ethnography.

      Setting & Population

      Adult patients with CKD stages 1 to 5.

      Search Strategy & Sources

      MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from the earliest date available to November 2015. Qualitative studies were selected that explored patients’ views and experiences of a CKD diagnosis and their adjustment.

      Analytical Approach

      Meta-ethnography was adopted to synthesize the findings.


      10 studies involving 596 patients with CKD from secondary-care settings were included. 7 key themes were identified: a challenging diagnosis, diverse beliefs about causation, anticipated concerns about progression, delaying disease progression, unmet informational needs, psychosocial impact of CKD, and adjustment to life with CKD.


      Limited to views and experiences of participants in included studies, which were mostly conducted in high-income countries. Studies not written in English were excluded. Transferability of findings to other populations may be limited.


      This review highlights variation in patients’ understanding of CKD, an overall lack of information on the trajectory of CKD, and a need for psychosocial support, especially in later stages, to help patients adjust to living with CKD. Future research that acknowledges CKD as a condition with diverse complicating morbidities and explores how patients’ information and psychosocial needs vary according to severity and comorbid conditions would be beneficial. This will support delivery of easily understandable, timely, and targeted information about CKD, as well as practical advice about recommended lifestyle changes.

      Index Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Slevin J.
        • Taylor A.
        Understanding what the public know about their kidneys and what they do. Findings from Ipsos MORI survey July 2014.
        Think Kidneys/Ipsos MORI, London, UK2015
        • McIntyre N.J.
        • Fluck R.
        • McIntyre C.
        • et al.
        Treatment needs and diagnosis awareness in primary care patients with chronic kidney disease.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62: e227-e232
        • Calestani M.
        • Tonkin-Crine S.
        • Pruthi R.
        • et al.
        Patient attitudes towards kidney transplant listing: qualitative findings from the ATTOM study.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014; 29: 2144-2150
        • Griva K.
        • Li Z.H.
        • Lai A.Y.
        • et al.
        Perspectives of patients, families, and health care professionals on decision-making about dialysis modality–the good, the bad, and the misunderstandings!.
        Perit Dial Int. 2013; 33: 280-289
        • Karamanidou C.
        • Weinman J.
        • Horne R.
        A qualitative study of treatment burden among haemodialysis recipients.
        J Health Psychol. 2014; 19: 556-569
        • Kelly D.
        • Noble H.
        • Meyer J.
        • et al.
        Reasons renal patients give for deciding not to dialyze: a prospective qualitative interview study.
        Dial Transplant. 2009; 38: 1-5
        • Morton R.L.
        • Devitt J.
        • Howard K.
        • et al.
        Patient views about treatment of stage 5 CKD: a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2010; 55: 431-440
        • Seah A.S.T.
        • Tan F.
        • Srinivas S.
        • et al.
        Opting out of dialysis – exploring patients' decisions to forego dialysis in favour of conservative non-dialytic management for end-stage renal disease.
        Health Expect. 2013; 18: 1018-1029
        • Tonkin-Crine S.
        • Okamoto I.
        • Leydon G.M.
        • et al.
        Understanding by older patients of dialysis and conservative management for chronic kidney failure.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 65: 443-450
        • Harwood L.
        • Clark A.M.
        Understanding pre-dialysis modality decision-making: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2013; 50: 109-120
        • Morton R.L.
        • Tong A.
        • Howard K.
        • et al.
        The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies [abstract].
        Nephrology. 2009; 14: A32
        • Tjaden L.
        • Tong A.
        • Henning P.
        • et al.
        Children's experiences of dialysis: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
        Arch Dis Child. 2012; 97: 395-402
        • Tong A.
        • Jesudason S.
        • Craig J.C.
        • et al.
        Perspectives on pregnancy in women with chronic kidney disease: systematic review of qualitative studies.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015; 30: 652-661
        • Tong A.
        • Lesmana B.
        • Johnson D.W.
        • et al.
        The perspectives of adults living with peritoneal dialysis: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2013; 61: 873-888
        • Pope C.
        • Mays N.
        • Popay J.
        Synthesising Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods.
        McGraw-Hill Education (UK), London2007
        • Seers K.
        What is a qualitative synthesis?.
        Evid Based Nurs. 2012; 15: 101-102
      1. Ring NA, Ritchie K, Mandava L, et al. A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. 2011.

        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
        • Noblit G.W.
        • Hare R.D.
        Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA1988
        • Tong A.
        • Flemming K.
        • McInnes E.
        • et al.
        Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12: 1
        • Schell J.O.
        • Patel U.D.
        • Steinhauser K.E.
        • et al.
        Discussions of the kidney disease trajectory by elderly patients and nephrologists: a qualitative study.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 59: 495-503
        • Lin C.C.
        • Chen M.C.
        • Hsieh H.F.
        • et al.
        Illness representations and coping processes of Taiwanese patients with early-stage chronic kidney disease.
        J Nurs Res. 2013; 21: 120-128
        • Costantini L.
        • Beanlands H.
        • McCay E.
        • et al.
        The self-management experience of people with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.
        Nephrol Nurs J. 2008; 35: 147-155
        • Anderson K.
        • Devitt J.
        • Cunningham J.
        • et al.
        “All they said was my kidneys were dead”: indigenous Australian patients’ understanding of their chronic kidney disease.
        Med J Aust. 2008; 189: 499-503
        • Lopez-Vargas P.A.
        • Tong A.
        • Phoon R.K.
        • et al.
        Knowledge deficit of patients with stage 1-4 CKD: a focus group study.
        Nephrology. 2014; 19: 234-243
        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Chadban S.
        • et al.
        Patients’ experiences and perspectives of living with CKD.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: 689-700
        • Campos C.G.
        • Mantovani Mde F.
        • Nascimento M.E.
        • et al.
        [Social representations of illness among people with chronic kidney disease].
        Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2015; 36: 106-112
        • Lindqvist R.
        • Carlsson M.
        • Sjoden P.O.
        Perceived consequences of being a renal failure patient.
        Nephrol Nurs J. 2000; 27: 291-297
        • Green J.A.
        • Bouleware L.E.
        Patient education and support during CKD transitions: when the possible becomes probable.
        Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016; 23: 231-239
        • Palmer S.C.
        • Hanson C.S.
        • Craig J.C.
        • et al.
        Dietary and fluid restrictions in CKD: a thematic synthesis of patient views from qualitative studies.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 65: 559-573
        • Harrison J.D.
        • Young J.M.
        • Price M.A.
        • et al.
        What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review.
        Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17: 1117-1128
        • Department of Health
        Better Information, Better Choices, Better Health: Putting Information at the Centre of Health.
        Department of Health, London, UK2004
        • Department of Health
        National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Vision.
        Department of Health, London, UK2010
        • Blakeman T.
        • Protheroe J.
        • Chew-Graham C.
        • et al.
        Understanding the management of early-stage chronic kidney disease in primary care: a qualitative study.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62: 233-242
        • Fraser S.D.S.
        • Roderick P.
        • May C.
        • McIntyre N.
        • McIntyre C.
        • Fluck R.J.
        • Shardlow A.
        • Taal M.W.
        The burden of comorbidity in people with chronic kidney disease stage 3: a cohort study.
        BMC Nephrol. 2015; 16: 193
        • Tonelli M.W.
        • Guthrie N.
        • James B.
        • et al.
        Comorbidity as a driver of adverse outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease.
        Kidney Int. 2015; 88: 859-866
        • Al-Arabi S.
        Quality of life: subjective descriptions of challenges to patients with end stage renal disease.
        Nephrol Nurs J. 2006; 33: 285-293
        • Dekker W.
        • Uerz I.
        • Wils J.-P.
        Living well with end stage renal disease: patients' narratives interrupted from a virtue perspective.
        Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2005; 8: 485-506