Advertisement

The “Advancing American Kidney Health” Executive Order: Challenges and Opportunities for the Large Dialysis Organizations

  • Eugene Lin
    Correspondence
    Address for Correspondence: Eugene Lin, MD, MS, 1333 San Pablo St, MMR 622, Los Angeles, CA 90033.
    Affiliations
    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

    Leonard D Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

    University Kidney Research Organization, Kidney Research Center, Los Angeles, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Paul B. Ginsburg
    Affiliations
    Leonard D Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

    Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

    Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
    Search for articles by this author
  • Glenn M. Chertow
    Affiliations
    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

    Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jeffrey S. Berns
    Affiliations
    Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:August 04, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.07.007
      FEATURE EDITOR:
      Daniel E. Weiner
      ADVISORY BOARD:
      L. Ebony Boulware
      Kevin Erickson
      Eduardo Lacson Jr
      Bruce M. Robinson
      Wolfgang Winkelmayer
      Policy Forum highlights aspects of nephrology relating to payment and social policy, legislation, regulation, demographics, politics, and ethics, contextualizing these issues as they relate to the lives and practices of members of the kidney community, including providers, payers, and patients.
      Although patients receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT) constitute 1% of the Medicare population, they account for >7% of Medicare spending.
      • Saran R.
      • Robinson B.
      • Abbott K.C.
      • et al.
      USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.
      Outpatient dialysis treatments make up >25% of this spending. Close to 90% of patients undergoing dialysis use in-center hemodialysis (HD), a trend that has persisted for more than 2 decades despite evidence suggesting that home dialysis has similar patient outcomes,
      • Mehrotra R.
      • Chiu Y.-W.
      • Kalantar-Zadeh K.
      • Bargman J.
      • Vonesh E.
      Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
      greater patient satisfaction,
      • Walker R.C.
      • Hanson C.S.
      • Palmer S.C.
      • et al.
      Patient and caregiver perspectives on home hemodialysis: a systematic review.
      and reduced Medicare costs.
      • Saran R.
      • Robinson B.
      • Abbott K.C.
      • et al.
      USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.
      In July 2019, the “Advancing American Kidney Health” (AAKH) Executive Order
      The White House
      Executive Order on Advancing American Kidney Health. Published July 10, 2019.
      was signed, which aims to reduce the dominance of in-center HD in the United States. In this editorial, we examine how the AAKH might reshape the US dialysis market. We focus on the 2 large dialysis organizations (LDOs), DaVita and Fresenius, which provide >75% of US maintenance dialysis treatments.
      Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Published March 2018.

       Proposed Policy Changes: A Threat to the Existing Dialysis Industry

      The AAKH made it a national goal to increase the adoption of home dialysis and kidney transplantation to 80% of the incident KRT population by 2025,
      The White House
      Executive Order on Advancing American Kidney Health. Published July 10, 2019.
      a dramatic increase from its current combined rate of 12%.
      • Saran R.
      • Robinson B.
      • Abbott K.C.
      • et al.
      USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.
      To achieve this goal, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Innovation Center (CMMI) proposed a mandatory payment model, the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model, which will adjust dialysis facilities’ and nephrologists’ payments based on home dialysis and kidney transplantation rates.
      Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
      Medicare Program; Specialty Care Models to Improve Quality of Care and Reduce Expenditures. 42 CFR Part 512. CMS-5527-P.
      Bonuses and penalties are potentially large, up to 10% and 13% of total payments, respectively. Additionally, CMMI has proposed 4 voluntary payment models that will reward nephrologists who successfully steer patients away from in-center HD through preemptive transplantation or forestalling KRT.
      Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
      Kidney Care Choices (KCC) Model: Request for Applications (RFA). Published October 10, 2019.
      The central thrust of these models is to discourage in-center HD. Although the LDOs might agree with this goal, they would likely prefer gradually phasing in home dialysis to coordinate with depreciating in-center capital investments (eg, dialysis machines and water treatment facilities). Despite payment incentives for home dialysis,
      • Lin E.
      • Cheng X.S.
      • Chin K.-K.
      • et al.
      Home dialysis in the prospective payment system era.
      an additional year of in-center HD increases a facility’s margin by 0.15% versus 0.08% with peritoneal dialysis (PD).
      United States Government Accountability Office
      End-Stage Renal Disease: Medicare Payment Refinements Could Promote Increased Use of Home Dialysis. Report to the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. GAO-16-125. Published October 2015.
      In the short term, in-center HD is less costly given already existing (and paid for) capital. Under the ETC, facilities must accelerate plans to expand home dialysis investments and retrain their staff to support home dialysis. Consequently, dialysis providers dependent on in-center HD face large risks of having to write down the value of in-center capital investments.
      Unsurprisingly, the LDOs and other dialysis providers wrote a joint letter to CMS criticizing the ETC model.
      Kidney Care Partners
      Re: CMS-5527-P: Medicare Program; Specialty Care Models to Improve Quality of Care and Reduce Expenditures. Published September 15, 2019.
      Originally slated to start on January 1, 2020, the model has not been implemented, with no final rule released to date. Historically, the LDOs have mounted successful resistance against changes in regulation that could meaningfully change the dialysis industry.
      • Firozi P.
      The Health 202: the dialysis industry spent more than $100 million to beat a California ballot measure. The Washington Post.

       Reforming Status Quo Kidney Care

      The new payment models represent a unique opportunity to reshape status quo kidney care. In-center HD outcomes are dismal: 22% of patients die the first year of dialysis and patients experience an average of 1.7 hospitalizations per year.
      • Saran R.
      • Robinson B.
      • Abbott K.C.
      • et al.
      USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.
      Poor outcomes are partially attributable to suboptimal predialysis care.
      • Young B.A.
      • Chan C.
      • Blagg C.
      • et al.
      How to overcome barriers and establish a successful home HD program.
      Although most transition to a superior dialysis access by the end of the first year, >80% of patients starting dialysis use a catheter.
      • Saran R.
      • Robinson B.
      • Abbott K.C.
      • et al.
      USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.
      The probability of switching from in-center HD to home dialysis decreases from 7% in the first month of dialysis to <1% by the fourth month.
      • Lin E.
      • Chertow G.M.
      • Bhattacharya J.
      • Lakdawalla D.
      Early delays in insurance coverage and long-term use of home-based peritoneal dialysis.
      Earlier predialysis care coordination could hasten optimal dialysis access placements and more effectively promote home dialysis.
      Additionally, the highly consolidated dialysis industry has had mixed success in improving outcomes. Theoretically, industry consolidation should result in efficiency gains through economies of scale
      • Dor A.
      • Held P.J.
      • Pauly M.V.
      The Medicare cost of renal dialysis. Evidence from a statistical cost function.
      that could be allocated to improve care coordination. However, observational studies suggest that for-profit facilities have lower patient satisfaction
      • Brady B.M.
      • Zhao B.
      • Niu J.
      • et al.
      Patient-reported experiences of dialysis care within a national pay-for-performance system.
      and marginally lower rates of living and deceased donor transplantation.
      • Gander J.C.
      • Zhang X.
      • Ross K.
      • et al.
      Association between dialysis facility ownership and access to kidney transplantation.
      Still, given the right incentives, the LDOs could effect meaningful change. One example is the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) model, which allows dialysis facilities (mostly LDOs) to function as Accountable Care Organizations. Under the CEC, dialysis facilities modestly reduced overall health care expenditures and hospitalizations.
      • Marrufo G.
      • Negrusa B.
      • Ullman D.
      • et al.
      Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) model: performance year 2 annual evaluation report.
      Unfortunately, the CEC did not increase home dialysis use or kidney transplant listings.
      Market consolidation also presents unique challenges and opportunities to the ETC. To assess the ETC’s effects, CMMI has proposed a randomized rollout. However, because CMMI will evaluate the performance of individual facilities (and not chains), the LDOs may be tempted to funnel home dialysis resources from control facilities to those randomized to mandatory participation. Accordingly, commenters including the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission have criticized its design.
      Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
      Re: File code CMS-5527-P. Published online September 3, 2019.
      One alternative is to evaluate chain performance and randomize 1 entire LDO to mandatory participation. Such a design would allow the participating LDO to leverage its size to experiment with establishing regional centers specializing in home dialysis or with coordinating care among multiple facilities.
      CMMI has also shifted its focus away from dialysis facilities and toward including nephrologists.
      Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
      Kidney Care Choices (KCC) Model: Request for Applications (RFA). Published October 10, 2019.
      Although the ETC is ostensibly a KRT payment model, steering care toward kidney transplantation and home dialysis and away from in-center HD requires substantial predialysis planning, which is mostly within nephrologists’ purview. Additionally, the ETC directly evaluates nephrologists’ performance, in contrast to prior value-based purchasing programs. Finally, the voluntary payment models explicitly require the inclusion of patients with chronic kidney disease, with bonuses and penalties attached to slowing chronic kidney disease progression and transplantation.
      Even so, nephrologists’ leverage is limited. The path to kidney transplantation is slowed by a drastic shortage of deceased donor organs and impediments to living kidney donation, including familial clustering of kidney disease and its risk factors, knowledge deficits, fears, and insufficient consideration of financial and medical barriers to the donor. Moreover, lack of social supports and fears of “medicalizing” the home often lessen enthusiasm for home dialysis. Still, if nephrologists are successful in increasing home dialysis, promoting preemptive transplantation, and slowing progression to kidney failure, the LDOs will need to change tack from an in-center HD–centric business model.

       Implications for the LDOs

      Assuming CMMI implements the payment models, the LDOs will begin shifting away from an in-center HD–dominant strategy (Table 1). The transition will undoubtedly require substantial upfront spending through home dialysis capital purchases and medical staff retraining programs. Fresenius already made a large home HD investment by acquiring NxStage Medical in February 2019, with the goal of increasing home dialysis use from 12% to 25% of its patients by 2022.
      • Bannow T.
      Fresenius Medical Care closes $2 billion NxStage acquisition. Modern Healthcare.
      Table 1Potential Impact of the Proposed Medicare Payment Models on the Dialysis Market
      Market FeaturePotential Future Change
      Treatment focus
      • Shift from in-center hemodialysis centric to optimizing CKD management, increasing home dialysis use, and transplantation
      Capital investments
      • Accelerated depreciation of in-center capital in favor of home dialysis capital
      • Closures of aging brick and mortar in-center hemodialysis units
      • Vertical integration with home dialysis suppliers (eg, Fresenius’ acquisition of NxStage)
      Staff
      • Retraining of staff to increase provision of home dialysis
      Costs
      • Financial penalties for over-reliance on in-center hemodialysis
      • Potential reductions in home dialysis supply costs
      Revenue opportunities
      • Bonuses for collaborating with nephrologists to slow progression of CKD
      • Bonuses for increasing home dialysis and transplantation
      Competition
      • Emergence of new competitors focused on improving care coordination (Strive, Cricket Health, Somatus) and home dialysis (CVS)
      Regulation
      • Implementation of ETC model
      • Payment models to transition away from focusing on dialysis to focusing on the entire spectrum of kidney disease
      Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; ETC, End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices.
      A successful business strategy will likely require collaborative partnerships with nephrologists able to coordinate predialysis care, plan for home dialysis, and refer for transplantation. The most effective partnerships could take several different forms, including joint governance partnerships or even strategic buyouts of nephrology practices. Common to any of these strategies is a focus on reducing the morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with the first year of KRT.
      Increased demand for home dialysis may also lower home dialysis operating costs by rejuvenating a market dominated by a few companies (eg, Baxter owns 80% of the global PD supply market).
      • Cairns E.
      Interview – Baxter aims to entrench leadership in peritoneal dialysis. Evaluate Vantage.
      Baxter announced in 2019 that it would expand its manufacturing capabilities to meet the increased demand for PD supplies.
      • Rachal M.
      Baxter to expand home dialysis on heels of Trump kidney initiative. MedTech Dive.
      Other suppliers may also expand their production and new companies could enter the market, bolstering a fragile supply chain that disrupted PD growth in 2014 when Baxter suddenly announced PD supply shortages.
      • Jensen V.
      • Throckmorton D.C.
      Shortage of peritoneal dialysis solution and the Food and Drug Administration’s response.
      The payment models’ projected effect on consolidation in the dialysis market remains unclear. The influx of patients receiving KRT into Medicare Advantage plans in 2021 may dilute the models’ impact and further casts uncertainty over the future.
      Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
      Medicare Program; Contract Year 2021 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, and Medicare Cost Plan Program. CMS-4190-F. 85 FR 33796.
      Although the LDOs hold the most in-center capital, they have a successful track record in adapting to payment policy changes. Smaller dialysis companies or new entrants
      • Ozgen H.
      Does chain affiliation make a difference in efficiency of dialysis providers in the USA.
      may find it difficult to meet all regulatory requirements. If the LDOs can effectively maintain patients on home dialysis and increase kidney transplantation rates, these policies could increase market consolidation. To the extent that these developments improve patient outcomes, such developments would be welcome despite a more consolidated market.
      However, the new payment models may increase market competition by reducing the infrastructure requirements of providing dialysis, making entry easier than with an in-center–dominant market. CVS has already emerged as a potential competitor to the LDOs and recently launched its first clinical trial for a new home HD device.
      • Landi H.
      CVS moves into kidney care with clinical trial for home dialysis device. Fierce Healthcare.
      If successful, the company plans to offer dialysis services in direct competition to the LDOs. Other companies, such as Cricket Health, Somatus, and Strive Health, have also entered the marketplace.

       Conclusions

      In the past, a consolidated dialysis market has been associated with mixed outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, and sluggish innovation. The LDOs’ resistance to CMS’ new kidney disease payment models suggests that the LDOs have much to lose in a market that prioritizes home dialysis and kidney transplantation over in-center HD. It is unclear whether the LDOs will adapt to these changes given their strong resistance. These changes might further consolidate the dialysis industry or, conversely, provide opportunity to new entrants. Irrespective of the policies’ effects on consolidation, the nephrology community has reason for optimism if incentives to improve care and payment for that care are finally aligned.

      Article Information

      Authors’ Full Names and Academic Degrees

      Eugene Lin, MD, MS, Paul B. Ginsburg, PhD, Glenn M. Chertow, MD, MPH, and Jeffrey S. Berns, MD.

      Support

      This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK): Dr Lin receives support from NIDDK K08DK118213 and Dr Chertow receives support from NIDDK K24 DK085446 .

      Financial Disclosure

      Dr Lin receives consulting income from Acumen, LLC. Dr Chertow serves on the Board of Directors of Satellite Healthcare, a not-for-profit dialysis provider. The other authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

      Disclaimer

      The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The data reported here have been supplied by the US Renal Data System. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the US government.

      Peer Review

      Received April 30, 2020, in response to an invitation from the journal. Evaluated by 3 external peer reviewers, with direct editorial input from the Feature Editor. Accepted in revised form July 8, 2020. Deputy Editor Dr Berns, who typically participates in the decision chain for Policy Forum, was entirely recused from any involvement in the manuscript consideration process.

      References

        • Saran R.
        • Robinson B.
        • Abbott K.C.
        • et al.
        USRDS 2018 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2019; 73: A7-A8
        • Mehrotra R.
        • Chiu Y.-W.
        • Kalantar-Zadeh K.
        • Bargman J.
        • Vonesh E.
        Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.
        Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 110-118
        • Walker R.C.
        • Hanson C.S.
        • Palmer S.C.
        • et al.
        Patient and caregiver perspectives on home hemodialysis: a systematic review.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 65: 451-463
        • The White House
        Executive Order on Advancing American Kidney Health. Published July 10, 2019.
      1. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Published March 2018.
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
        Medicare Program; Specialty Care Models to Improve Quality of Care and Reduce Expenditures. 42 CFR Part 512. CMS-5527-P.
        Fed Regist. 2019; 84: 34478-34595
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
        Kidney Care Choices (KCC) Model: Request for Applications (RFA). Published October 10, 2019.
        https://innovation.cms.gov/Files/x/kcc-rfa.pdf
        Date accessed: February 7, 2020
        • Lin E.
        • Cheng X.S.
        • Chin K.-K.
        • et al.
        Home dialysis in the prospective payment system era.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28: 2993-3004
        • United States Government Accountability Office
        End-Stage Renal Disease: Medicare Payment Refinements Could Promote Increased Use of Home Dialysis. Report to the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. GAO-16-125. Published October 2015.
        https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/673140.pdf
        Date accessed: June 19, 2019
        • Kidney Care Partners
        Re: CMS-5527-P: Medicare Program; Specialty Care Models to Improve Quality of Care and Reduce Expenditures. Published September 15, 2019.
        • Firozi P.
        The Health 202: the dialysis industry spent more than $100 million to beat a California ballot measure. The Washington Post.
        (Published November 12, 2018)
        • Young B.A.
        • Chan C.
        • Blagg C.
        • et al.
        How to overcome barriers and establish a successful home HD program.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 7: 2023-2032
        • Lin E.
        • Chertow G.M.
        • Bhattacharya J.
        • Lakdawalla D.
        Early delays in insurance coverage and long-term use of home-based peritoneal dialysis.
        Med Care. 2020; 58: 632-642
        • Dor A.
        • Held P.J.
        • Pauly M.V.
        The Medicare cost of renal dialysis. Evidence from a statistical cost function.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 879-891
        • Brady B.M.
        • Zhao B.
        • Niu J.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported experiences of dialysis care within a national pay-for-performance system.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 1358-1367
        • Gander J.C.
        • Zhang X.
        • Ross K.
        • et al.
        Association between dialysis facility ownership and access to kidney transplantation.
        JAMA. 2019; 322: 957-973
        • Marrufo G.
        • Negrusa B.
        • Ullman D.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) model: performance year 2 annual evaluation report.
        • Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
        Re: File code CMS-5527-P. Published online September 3, 2019.
        • Bannow T.
        Fresenius Medical Care closes $2 billion NxStage acquisition. Modern Healthcare.
        (Published February 26, 2019)
        • Cairns E.
        Interview – Baxter aims to entrench leadership in peritoneal dialysis. Evaluate Vantage.
        (Published June 29, 2017)
        • Rachal M.
        Baxter to expand home dialysis on heels of Trump kidney initiative. MedTech Dive.
        (Published July 11, 2019)
        • Jensen V.
        • Throckmorton D.C.
        Shortage of peritoneal dialysis solution and the Food and Drug Administration’s response.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10: 1484-1486
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
        Medicare Program; Contract Year 2021 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, and Medicare Cost Plan Program. CMS-4190-F. 85 FR 33796.
        Fed Regist. 2020; 85: 33796-33911
        • Ozgen H.
        Does chain affiliation make a difference in efficiency of dialysis providers in the USA.
        Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62: 2112-2124
        • Landi H.
        CVS moves into kidney care with clinical trial for home dialysis device. Fierce Healthcare.
        (Published July 18, 2019) (Accessed April 28, 2020)