Advertisement
American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Advance Care Planning Coaching in CKD Clinics: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

Published:October 11, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.08.019

      Rationale & Objective

      Although guidelines recommend more and earlier advance care planning (ACP) for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), scant evidence exists to guide incorporation of ACP into clinical practice for patients with stages of CKD prior to kidney failure. Involving nephrology team members in addition to primary care providers in this important patient-centered process may increase its accessibility. Our study examined the effect of coaching implemented in CKD clinics on patient engagement with ACP.

      Study Design

      Multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

      Setting & Participants

      Three CKD clinics in different states participated: 273 patients consented to participate, 254 were included in analysis. Eligible patients were 55 years or older, had stage 3-5 CKD, and were English speaking.

      Intervention

      Nurses or social workers with experience in nephrology or palliative care delivered individualized in-person ACP sessions. The enhanced control group was given Make Your Wishes About You (MY WAY) education materials and was verbally encouraged to bring their completed advance directives to the clinic.

      Outcome

      Primary outcome measures were scores on a 45-point ACP engagement scale at 14 weeks and a documented advance directive or portable medical order at 16 weeks after enrollment.

      Results

      Among 254 participants analyzed, 46.5% were 65-74 years of age, and 54% had CKD stage 3. The coached patients scored 1.9 points higher at 14 weeks on the ACP engagement scale (β = 1.87 [95% CI, 0.13-3.64]) adjusted for baseline score and site. Overall, 32.8% of intervention patients (41 of 125) had an advance directive compared with 17.8% (23 of 129) of patients in the control group. In a site-adjusted multivariable model, coached patients were 79% more likely to have a documented advance directive or portable medical order (adjusted risk ratio, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.18-2.72]), with the impact principally evident at only 1 study site.

      Limitations

      Small number of study sites and possible unrepresentativeness of the broader CKD population by study participants.

      Conclusions

      Individualized coaching may be effective in enhancing ACP, but its impact may be influenced by the health care environment where it is delivered.

      Funding

      The Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation, via the Greater Value Portfolio.

      Trial Registration

      Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03506087.

      Graphical abstract

      Index Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Davison S.N.
        • Levin A.
        • Moss A.H.
        • et al.
        Executive summary of the KDIGO Controversies Conference on Supportive Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: developing a roadmap to improving quality care.
        Kidney Int. 2015; 88: 446-459https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2015.110
        • Renal Physicians Association (RPA)
        Clinical Practice Guideline on Shared Decision-Making in the Appropriate Initiation of and Withdrawal from Dialysis, 2nd ed. RPA, 2010.
        • Harris D.C.H.
        • Davies S.J.
        • Finkelstein F.O.
        • et al.
        Increasing access to integrated ESKD care as part of universal health coverage.
        Kidney Int. 2019; 95: S1-S33https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.005
        • Williams A.W.
        • Dwyer A.C.
        • Eddy A.A.
        • et al.
        Critical and honest conversations: the evidence behind the “Choosing Wisely” campaign recommendations by the American Society of Nephrology.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; 7: 1664-1672https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04970512
        • Holley J.L.
        • Nespor S.
        • Rault R.
        Chronic in-center hemodialysis patients’ attitudes, knowledge, and behavior towards advance directives.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993; 3: 1405-1408
        • Hines S.C.
        • Glover J.J.
        • Holley J.L.
        • Babrow A.S.
        • Badzek L.A.
        • Moss A.H.
        Dialysis patients’ preferences for family-based advance care planning.
        Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 825-828
        • Hines S.C.
        • Glover J.J.
        • Babrow A.S.
        • Holley J.L.
        • Badzek L.A.
        • Moss A.H.
        Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences.
        J Palliat Med. 2001; 4: 481-489https://doi.org/10.1089/109662101753381629
        • Davison S.N.
        Facilitating advance care planning for patients with end-stage renal disease: the patient perspective.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 1: 1023-1028https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01050306
        • Davison S.N.
        • Christy Simpson.
        Hope and advance care planning in patients with end stage renal disease: qualitative interview study.
        BMJ. 2006; 333: 886https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38940.355602.80
        • Goff S.L.
        • Eneanya N.D.
        • Feinberg R.
        • et al.
        Advance care planning: a qualitative study of dialysis patients and families.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10: 390-400https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.07490714
        • Ladin K.
        • Neckermann I.
        • D’Arcangelo N.
        • et al.
        Advance care planning in older adults with CKD: patient, care partner, and clinician perspectives.
        J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32: 1527-1535https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020091298
        • Cohen L.M.
        • McCue J.D.
        • Germain M.
        • Woods A.
        Denying the dying: advance directives and dialysis discontinuation.
        Psychosomatics. 1997; 38: 27-34https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(97)71500-7
        • Holley J.L.
        • Stackiewicz L.
        • Dacko C.
        • Rault R.
        Factors influencing dialysis patients’ completion of advance directives.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30: 356-360https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90279-1
        • Weisbord S.D.
        • Carmody S.S.
        • Bruns F.J.
        • et al.
        Symptom burden, quality of life, advance care planning and the potential value of palliative care in severely ill haemodialysis patients.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18: 1345-1352https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg105
        • Tamura M.K.
        • Goldstein M.K.
        • Pérez-Stable E.J.
        Preferences for dialysis withdrawal and engagement in advance care planning within a diverse sample of dialysis patients.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25: 237-242https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp430
        • Feely M.A.
        • Hildebrandt D.
        • Varayil J.E.
        • Mueller P.S.
        Prevalence and contents of advance directives of patients with ESRD receiving dialysis.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11: 2204-2209https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12131115
        • Goff S.L.
        • Unruh M.L.
        • Klingensmith J.
        • et al.
        Advance care planning with patients on hemodialysis: an implementation study.
        BMC Palliat Care. 2019; 18: 64https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0437-2
        • McAdoo S.P.
        • Brown E.A.
        • Chesser A.M.
        • Farrington K.
        • Salisbury E.M.
        Measuring the quality of end of life management in patients with advanced kidney disease: results from the pan-Thames renal audit group.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 27: 1548-1554https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr514
        • Kirchhoff K.T.
        • Hammes B.J.
        • Kehl K.A.
        • Briggs L.A.
        • Brown R.L.
        Effect of a disease-specific advance care planning intervention on end-of-life care.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60: 946-950https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03917.x
        • Oskoui T.
        • Pandya R.
        • Weiner D.E.
        • Wong J.B.
        • Koch-Weser S.
        • Ladin K.
        Advance care planning among older adults with advanced non-dialysis-dependent CKD and their care partners: perceptions versus reality?.
        Kidney Med. 2020; 2: 116-124https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2019.11.002
        • Holley J.L.
        • Davison S.N.
        Advance care planning for patients with advanced CKD: a need to move forward.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015; 10: 344-346https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00290115
        • Ramer S.J.
        • Koncicki H.M.
        To dialysis and beyond: the nephrologist’s responsibility for advance care planning.
        Kidney Med. 2020; 2: 102-104https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2020.02.002
        • McAdams-DeMarco M.A.
        • Daubresse M.
        • Bae S.
        • Gross A.L.
        • Carlson M.C.
        • Segev D.L.
        Dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and mortality after hemodialysis initiation.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13: 1339-1347https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10150917
        • Kallenberg M.H.
        • Kleinveld H.A.
        • Dekker F.W.
        • et al.
        Functional and cognitive impairment, frailty, and adverse health outcomes in older patients reaching ESRD—a systematic review.
        Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11: 1624-1639https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.13611215
        • Drew D.A.
        • Weiner D.E.
        • Tighiouart H.
        • et al.
        Cognitive decline and its risk factors in prevalent hemodialysis patients.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2017; 69: 780-787https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.015
        • Perry E.
        • Swartz J.
        • Brown S.
        • Smith D.
        • Kelly G.
        • Swartz R.
        Peer mentoring: a culturally sensitive approach to end-of-life planning for long-term dialysis patients.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 46: 111-119https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.03.018
        • Cervantes L.
        • Chonchol M.
        • Hasnain-Wynia R.
        • et al.
        Peer navigator intervention for Latinos on hemodialysis: a single-arm clinical trial.
        J Palliat Med. 2019; 22: 838-843https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0439
        • Bristowe K.
        • Shepherd K.
        • Bryan L.
        • et al.
        The development and piloting of the REnal specific Advanced Communication Training (REACT) programme to improve advance care planning for renal patients.
        Palliat Med. 2014; 28: 360-366https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313510342
        • Sellars M.
        • Morton R.L.
        • Clayton J.M.
        • et al.
        Case-control study of end-of-life treatment preferences and costs following advance care planning for adults with end-stage kidney disease.
        Nephrology. 2019; 24: 148-154https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13230
        • Simon J.
        • Murray A.
        • Raffin S.
        Facilitated advance care planning: what is the patient experience?.
        J Palliat Care. 2008; 24: 256-264https://doi.org/10.1177/082585970802400405
        • Song M.-K.
        • Donovan H.S.
        • Piraino B.M.
        • et al.
        Effects of an intervention to improve communication about end-of-life care among African Americans with chronic kidney disease.
        Appl Nurs Res. 2010; 23: 65-72https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2008.05.002
        • Tigert J.
        • Chaloner N.
        • Scarr B.
        • Webster K.
        Development of a pamphlet: introducing advance directives to hemodialysis patients and their families.
        CANNT J. 2005; 15: 20-24
        • Song M.-K.
        • Ward S.E.
        • Happ M.B.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of SPIRIT: an effective approach to preparing African American dialysis patients and families for end of life.
        Res Nurs Health. 2009; 32: 260-273https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20320
        • Song M.-K.
        • Ward S.E.
        • Lin F.-C.
        End-of-life decision-making confidence in surrogates of African-American dialysis patients is overly optimistic.
        J Palliat Med. 2012; 15: 412-417https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2011.0330
        • Song M.-K.
        • Ward S.E.
        • Lin F.-C.
        • et al.
        Racial differences in outcomes of an advance care planning intervention for dialysis patients and their surrogates.
        J Palliat Med. 2016; 19: 134-142https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0232
        • Amro O.W.
        • Ramasamy M.
        • Strom J.A.
        • Weiner D.E.
        • Jaber B.L.
        Nephrologist-facilitated advance care planning for hemodialysis patients: a quality improvement project.
        Am J Kidney Dis. 2016; 68: 103-109https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.11.024
        • Jornet A.R.
        • Castellanos L.A.B.
        • Contador M.I.B.
        • Morera J.C.O.
        • López J.A.I.
        Usefulness of questionnaires on advance directives in haemodialysis units.
        Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 32: 1676-1682https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx245
        • Kirchhoff K.T.
        • Hammes B.J.
        • Kehl K.a.
        • Briggs L.a.
        • Brown R.L.
        Effect of a disease-specific advance care planning intervention on end-of-life care.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60: 946-950https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03917.x
        • O’Halloran P.
        • Noble H.
        • Norwood K.
        • et al.
        Advance care planning with patients who have end-stage kidney disease: a systematic realist review.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 56: 795-807.e18https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.008
        • McMahan R.D.
        • Tellez I.
        • Sudore R.L.
        Deconstructing the complexities of advance care planning outcomes: what do we know and where do we go? A scoping review.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021; 69: 234-244https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16801
        • Aldous A.
        • Lupu D.
        • Simmens S.
        MY WAY Analysis.
        (Published online May 21, 2018. Accessed September 25, 2020)
        • Anderson E.
        • Aldous A.
        • Lupu D.
        Make Your Wishes About You (MY WAY): using motivational interviewing to foster advance care planning for patients with chronic kidney disease.
        Nephrol Nurs J. 2018; 45: 411-421
        • Prochaska J.O.
        • Velicer W.F.
        The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
        Am J Health Promot. 1997; 12: 38-48https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38
        • Sudore R.L.
        • Heyland D.K.
        • Barnes D.E.
        • et al.
        Measuring advance care planning: optimizing the advance care planning engagement survey.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 53: 669-681.e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.367
        • National POLST
        POLST for Healthcare Professionals.
        (Accessed August 20, 2021)
        • Hays R.D.
        • Schalet B.D.
        • Spritzer K.L.
        • Cella D.
        Two-item PROMIS global physical and mental health scales.
        J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2017; 1: 2https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0003-8
        • Raj R.
        • Ahuja K.
        • Frandsen M.
        • Murtagh F.E.M.
        • Jose M.
        Validation of the IPOS-Renal Symptom Survey in advanced kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 56: 281-287https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.04.006
        • Schickedanz A.D.
        • Schillinger D.
        • Landefeld C.S.
        • Knight S.J.
        • Williams B.A.
        • Sudore R.L.
        A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients’ self-identified barriers.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57: 31-39https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x
        • Cook R.J.
        • Farewell V.T.
        Multiplicity considerations in the design and analysis of clinical trials.
        J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 1996; 159: 93-110https://doi.org/10.2307/2983471
        • R Core Team
        R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
        • Sudore R.L.
        • Heyland D.K.
        • Lum H.D.
        • et al.
        Outcomes that define successful advance care planning: a Delphi panel consensus.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 55: 245-255.e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025
        • Haras M.S.
        Exploring the evidence for end-of-life care in patients with chronic kidney disease.
        Nephrol Nurs J. 2014; 41 (423): 416-419
        • McCutcheon A.K.
        • Kabcenell A.
        • Little K.
        • Sokol-Hessner L.
        Conversation Ready”: A Framework for Improving End-of-Life Care. Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2015.
        • Lim C.E.D.
        • Ng R.W.
        • Cheng N.C.L.
        • Cigolini M.
        • Kwok C.
        • Brennan F.
        Advance care planning for haemodialysis patients.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7: CD010737https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010737.pub2
        • Risk J.
        • Mohammadi L.
        • Rhee J.
        • Walters L.
        • Ward P.R.
        Barriers, enablers and initiatives for uptake of advance care planning in general practice: a systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e030275https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030275
        • Feldstein A.C.
        • Glasgow R.E.
        A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 34: 228-243https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6
        • Damschroder L.J.
        • Aron D.C.
        • Keith R.E.
        • Kirsh S.R.
        • Alexander J.A.
        • Lowery J.C.
        Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50